LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-51692: WordPress Bing Search API Integration plugin <= 0.3.3 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in askewbrook Bing Search API Integration abbs-bing-search allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Bing Search API Integration: from n/a through <= 0.3.3.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-51692 is a reflected XSS issue in the WordPress Bing Search API Integration plugin. An attacker could potentially cause a victim’s browser to run injected script through plugin-generated pages. It is high severity, but it requires user interaction and affects only sites using plugin versions through 0.3.3.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure. Prioritize public sites and sites used by administrators or authenticated staff. The main business risk is browser-side compromise through social engineering, not confirmed active mass exploitation.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-79 improper neutralization during web page generation in askewbrook Bing Search API Integration, package abbs-bing-search. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.1 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and changed scope. Affected versions are listed as through <=0.3.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress installations running Bing Search API Integration, package abbs-bing-search, versions <=0.3.3. Sites not using this plugin are not indicated as affected. The source bundle does not provide CPEs or identify managed-hosting-specific exposure.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. Reflected XSS generally depends on persuading a user to open attacker-controlled content or links. The evidence supports risk assessment, not claims of exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Source evidence is sparse: CVE metadata and Patchstack identify reflected XSS in versions <=0.3.3, but no exploit narrative, affected endpoint detail, patch version, or active exploitation evidence is included. Avoid assuming more than plugin presence and version-based exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the abbs-bing-search plugin.
  • Identify installations running Bing Search API Integration <=0.3.3.
  • Check vendor, WordPress, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or official mitigation.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where business impact is acceptable until safe guidance is confirmed.
  • Prioritize controls that reduce suspicious links reaching administrators and privileged users.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm plugin name, package slug, and installed version on each WordPress site.
  • Review public pages that render plugin search output for exposure.
  • Check WAF and web logs for suspicious plugin-related requests.
  • Verify whether Patchstack or vendor guidance now identifies a safe version.
  • Retest after remediation using non-destructive XSS validation methods.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-51692 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-51692Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
askewbrookBing Search API Integrationabbs-bing-search, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.