CVE-2024-51692: WordPress Bing Search API Integration plugin <= 0.3.3 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in askewbrook Bing Search API Integration abbs-bing-search allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Bing Search API Integration: from n/a through <= 0.3.3.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-51692 is a reflected XSS issue in the WordPress Bing Search API Integration plugin. An attacker could potentially cause a victim’s browser to run injected script through plugin-generated pages. It is high severity, but it requires user interaction and affects only sites using plugin versions through 0.3.3.
Executive priority
Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure. Prioritize public sites and sites used by administrators or authenticated staff. The main business risk is browser-side compromise through social engineering, not confirmed active mass exploitation.
Technical view
The issue is CWE-79 improper neutralization during web page generation in askewbrook Bing Search API Integration, package abbs-bing-search. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.1 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and changed scope. Affected versions are listed as through <=0.3.3.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to WordPress installations running Bing Search API Integration, package abbs-bing-search, versions <=0.3.3. Sites not using this plugin are not indicated as affected. The source bundle does not provide CPEs or identify managed-hosting-specific exposure.
Exploitation context
The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. Reflected XSS generally depends on persuading a user to open attacker-controlled content or links. The evidence supports risk assessment, not claims of exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
Source evidence is sparse: CVE metadata and Patchstack identify reflected XSS in versions <=0.3.3, but no exploit narrative, affected endpoint detail, patch version, or active exploitation evidence is included. Avoid assuming more than plugin presence and version-based exposure.
Mitigation direction
Inventory WordPress sites for the abbs-bing-search plugin.
Identify installations running Bing Search API Integration <=0.3.3.
Check vendor, WordPress, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or official mitigation.
Disable or remove the plugin where business impact is acceptable until safe guidance is confirmed.
Prioritize controls that reduce suspicious links reaching administrators and privileged users.
Validation and detection
Confirm plugin name, package slug, and installed version on each WordPress site.
Review public pages that render plugin search output for exposure.
Check WAF and web logs for suspicious plugin-related requests.
Verify whether Patchstack or vendor guidance now identifies a safe version.
Retest after remediation using non-destructive XSS validation methods.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.