Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This is a CSRF flaw in the WordPress Dynamic Widgets plugin through version 1.6.4. If an administrator is tricked into interacting with a malicious page while logged in, limited unauthorized changes may be possible. The sources do not show data theft, service outage, or confirmed exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat this as a moderate website integrity risk. Prioritize remediation where the plugin is active on public WordPress sites, especially sites with multiple administrators or frequent authenticated content management activity.
Technical view
CVE-2024-51669 affects Kalmang Dynamic Widgets dynamic-widgets through <= 1.6.4 and is categorized as CWE-352. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, and low integrity impact only.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites with the Dynamic Widgets plugin installed at version 1.6.4 or earlier. Sites without this plugin are not indicated as affected.
Exploitation context
The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires user interaction, consistent with tricking an authenticated user into triggering an unwanted action.
Researcher notes
Available evidence is sparse: no CPEs, no fixed version in the supplied bundle, and no exploit confirmation. Analysis should stay bounded to CSRF impact and the published CVSS vector unless vendor details add endpoint-level behavior.
Mitigation direction
Identify WordPress sites running the Dynamic Widgets plugin.
Check the installed plugin version against <= 1.6.4.
Review vendor and Patchstack guidance for fixed versions or official mitigations.
Disable or remove the plugin if no supported fix is available.
Prioritize administrator awareness around unexpected links while logged in.
Validation and detection
Inventory WordPress plugins across managed sites.
Confirm whether dynamic-widgets is installed and enabled.
Record the exact plugin version on each affected site.
Check CVE and Patchstack records for updated remediation guidance.
Review recent admin-side configuration changes for unexpected activity.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.