Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A WordPress plugin used to display Flickr galleries can be abused through CSRF to save malicious script content. If a targeted user takes an attacker-induced action, that script may persist and run later in a victim’s browser. This is high risk for affected WordPress sites, but the supplied sources do not show active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure. Prioritize sites where the plugin is active, public-facing, or administered by users likely to receive external links or emails. Do not assume compromise from the CVE alone; the supplied sources do not substantiate active exploitation.
Technical view
CVE-2024-51630 affects Lars Schenk Responsive Flickr Gallery through version 1.3.1. The issue is described as CSRF leading to stored XSS, mapped to CWE-352, with CVSS 3.1 score 7.1. The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, low complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to WordPress installations running the Responsive Flickr Gallery plugin, especially versions through 1.3.1. The provided affected-version metadata is incomplete, so inventory validation should rely on installed plugin name and version, not CPE matching.
Exploitation context
The source bundle marks KEV as false and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Successful abuse requires user interaction and would typically matter most where a privileged WordPress user can be induced into triggering an unwanted plugin action.
Researcher notes
The description states Responsive Flickr Gallery through 1.3.1 is affected, but the structured affected block is sparse and lists version data unclearly. No patch status, exploit proof, or detailed sink/source information is included in the supplied bundle, so validation should remain evidence-driven and non-invasive.
Mitigation direction
Inventory WordPress sites for the responsive-flickr-gallery plugin and installed version.
Check Patchstack and vendor guidance for an update, workaround, or removal recommendation.
Disable or remove the plugin where it is not business-critical.
Restrict WordPress administrative access to trusted users and hardened sessions.
Review stored plugin content for unexpected script-like changes.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether Responsive Flickr Gallery is installed on each WordPress site.
Record the exact installed plugin version and compare it with <= 1.3.1 exposure.
Review administrative audit logs for unexpected plugin configuration changes.
Inspect pages using the gallery for unauthorized persistent script content.
Verify compensating controls around WordPress admin authentication and CSRF-sensitive workflows.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.