LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-51620: WordPress Porsline plugin <= 1.0.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in porsline Porsline porsline allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Porsline: from n/a through <= 1.0.2.

HighCVSS 8.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-51620 is a high-severity blind SQL injection in the WordPress Porsline plugin through version 1.0.2. An attacker with some level of WordPress access may be able to query database information indirectly. There is no KEV listing or provided source evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize identification and remediation on internet-facing WordPress sites using Porsline. The main business risk is unauthorized database disclosure. Urgency is high where many WordPress users exist or where the site stores sensitive customer or operational data.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-89 improper neutralization in SQL commands affecting Porsline plugin versions through 1.0.2. CVSS 3.1 is 8.5: network reachable, low attack complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, high confidentiality impact, and low availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with the Porsline plugin installed at version 1.0.2 or earlier. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires an authenticated or otherwise privileged user, not anonymous access based on the provided data.

Exploitation context

The sources describe blind SQL injection, meaning database responses may be inferred rather than directly displayed. No public source in the bundle confirms active exploitation, weaponized exploit availability, or a patched replacement version.

Researcher notes

Do not assume anonymous exploitation; the published CVSS vector requires low privileges. The source bundle does not name a fixed version or workaround. Treat Patchstack and CVE as authoritative starting points, but validate against vendor release notes before closing remediation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Porsline plugin and record installed versions.
  • If version is 1.0.2 or earlier, check vendor or plugin repository guidance immediately.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not business-critical pending trusted remediation guidance.
  • Restrict WordPress accounts and privileges to the minimum required.
  • Increase monitoring for unusual authenticated activity against WordPress plugin endpoints.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the Porsline plugin is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Verify the installed plugin version is greater than 1.0.2 before marking remediated.
  • Review WordPress user lists for unnecessary low-privilege accounts.
  • Check application and database logs for unusual authenticated requests or query errors.
  • Track Patchstack and CVE records for updated fix or exploitation information.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-51620 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L3.14.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-51620Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
porslinePorslineporsline, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.