Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This CVE describes a privacy flaw in Phpgurukul's Beauty Parlour Management System v1.1. An unauthorized user may access other customers' appointment details, exposing personally identifiable information. The public record rates confidentiality impact as high, but the supplied sources do not name a fixed version or confirm exploitation in the wild.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority where the affected application is public-facing or stores customer appointment PII. The main business risk is privacy exposure, not service outage. Prioritize inventory, access restriction, and vendor guidance review.
Technical view
The issue is an IDOR/CWE-639 weakness in appointment-detail.php. The CVSS 3.1 vector is network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, with high confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability impact. Structured affected-product metadata is incomplete, though the description identifies Beauty Parlour Management System v1.1.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in internet-accessible deployments of Phpgurukul Beauty Parlour Management System v1.1 or copied code containing appointment-detail.php. The CVE record has no CPEs, so asset matching requires application inventory and code or route verification.
Exploitation context
The supplied sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The vulnerability class is commonly abused for unauthorized data access, and the CVSS vector suggests exploitation does not require authentication, but no exploit status should be inferred beyond the cited record.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, CWE-639 classification, and a GitHub reference. The affected metadata lists n/a values and no CPEs. No source in the bundle identifies a patch, workaround, exploit campaign, or KEV status.
Mitigation direction
- Check Phpgurukul or maintainer guidance for a fixed release or advisory.
- Restrict public access to the application until authorization checks are verified.
- Add object-level authorization checks before returning appointment details.
- Review access logs for unusual appointment-detail.php requests.
- Limit exposed PII in appointment detail responses where operationally possible.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether Beauty Parlour Management System v1.1 is deployed.
- Verify whether appointment-detail.php exists in production code.
- Perform authorized testing for object-level access control on appointment details.
- Check logs for repeated access to different appointment records.
- Document compensating controls if no vendor patch is available.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2024-51066 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6CISA-ADPVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.5HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/0x1c1ph3r/CVEs/tree/main/CVE-2024-51066CVE reference, mitre
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.