CVE-2024-50284: ksmbd: Fix the missing xa_store error check
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: Fix the missing xa_store error check
xa_store() can fail, it return xa_err(-EINVAL) if the entry cannot
be stored in an XArray, or xa_err(-ENOMEM) if memory allocation failed,
so check error for xa_store() to fix it.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A Linux kernel SMB server component can mishandle an internal storage failure. A remote, unauthenticated actor may be able to disrupt availability on exposed systems, but the sources do not describe a proven attack method. Confidentiality and integrity are not scored as affected. Risk is concentrated in systems that use ksmbd and make it network-reachable.
Executive priority
Address within the normal high-severity patch window, escalating internet-facing or business-critical ksmbd servers. Confirm ksmbd use first because systems not using the component are less likely exposed. The evidence does not support declaring an active exploitation emergency.
Technical view
ksmbd failed to check xa_store() errors. xa_store can return -EINVAL when an entry cannot be stored in an XArray or -ENOMEM on allocation failure. The correction adds error handling. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, with high availability impact. The issue maps to CWE-754.
Likely exposure
Systems are potentially exposed when running an affected Linux kernel with ksmbd enabled and reachable over a network. Internet-facing or untrusted-network SMB access raises priority. The supplied version records are ambiguous, so confirm applicability against kernel or distribution advisories rather than relying solely on the listed versions.
Exploitation context
The bundle reports no CISA KEV listing, and none of the cited sources establishes active exploitation or a public proof of concept. The CVSS vector indicates a potentially remote, unauthenticated availability attack, but the available evidence does not document practical triggering conditions or real-world incidents.
Researcher notes
The supplied version data is insufficient for deterministic range matching: it mixes versions and commit identifiers across affected and default-unaffected entries. Use the referenced stable commits and distribution advisory to confirm backports. The sources establish missing xa_store error checking but do not document trigger conditions, failure mechanics, proof of concept, or observed exploitation.
Mitigation direction
Install a vendor-supported kernel update containing the applicable referenced stable fix or distribution backport.
Follow Linux kernel and distribution guidance to resolve ambiguity in the supplied affected-version records.
If ksmbd is unnecessary, disable it under normal change-control procedures.
Until patched, restrict ksmbd access to trusted networks and clients.
Reboot into the updated kernel and confirm the intended version is active.
Validation and detection
Inventory running kernel versions on systems providing SMB through ksmbd.
Confirm whether ksmbd is enabled and reachable from untrusted or internet-connected networks.
Verify the installed kernel contains a referenced fix or an acknowledged distribution backport.
Review ksmbd and kernel logs for failures or unexpected service interruptions.
After updating, validate SMB availability from an approved client.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-754: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-754 · source CWE mapping
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.