CVE-2024-50262: bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen,
while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has
full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with
max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ...
0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with
.prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-50262 is a Linux kernel BPF bug where a local user with required privileges could trigger memory corruption in trie key iteration. The impact is high because kernel memory corruption can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The source bundle does not show confirmed active exploitation.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation in the normal high-severity kernel patch cycle, accelerated for shared infrastructure or systems with untrusted local access. There is no supplied evidence of active exploitation, but the impact profile justifies timely patching and vendor-advisory tracking.
Technical view
The bug is an out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key(). The function allocates a node stack sized to trie->max_prefixlen but can write trie->max_prefixlen + 1 entries when traversing full root-to-leaf paths. It is classified as CWE-787 with CVSS 3.1 score 7.8 and local, low-complexity, privileged attack conditions.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most relevant on Linux systems where affected kernels are deployed and local users or workloads can reach BPF map functionality. The bundle lists Linux kernel versions beginning at 4.16 and stable fix points including 4.19.323, 5.4.285, 5.10.229, 5.15.171, 6.1.116, 6.6.60, 6.11.7, and 6.12.
Exploitation context
The provided sources support local exploitation potential with low complexity and privileges required. They do not identify remote exploitation, public exploit availability, or CISA KEV listing. Treat this as a local privilege and kernel stability risk, especially on shared Linux hosts, container platforms, and appliances using affected kernels.
Researcher notes
Focus validation on kernel lineage and BPF LPM trie exposure rather than remote scanning. The root issue is stack sizing versus traversal depth in trie_get_next_key(). Evidence is sufficient for impact and remediation direction, but incomplete for exploit availability, distro-specific fixed package versions, and all downstream products.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade to vendor-provided kernels containing the referenced stable fixes.
Check Linux distribution advisories for package names and exact fixed builds.
Prioritize shared hosts, container nodes, and systems with untrusted local users.
Review vendor advisories for embedded or appliance products using Linux kernels.
If patching is delayed, follow vendor guidance on reducing BPF exposure.
Validation and detection
Inventory running kernel versions across Linux servers, appliances, and containers hosts.
Compare installed kernels with distribution advisories and referenced fixed stable versions.
Confirm BPF-related exposure assumptions for local users and workload isolation boundaries.
Verify Debian LTS or vendor kernel packages are updated where applicable.
Track Siemens advisories for affected industrial products, if in scope.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
3ADP providers
14Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-787 · source CWE mapping
Out-of-bounds Write
Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.