LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-48519: Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Ardupilot rover commit v.c56439b045162058df0ff136afea3081fcd06d38 allows a...

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Ardupilot rover commit v.c56439b045162058df0ff136afea3081fcd06d38 allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via the AP_InertialSensor_ADIS1647x.cpp, ArduRover, ADIS1647x Sensor component.

MediumCVSS 6.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a buffer overflow in an ArduPilot Rover code path for the ADIS1647x inertial sensor. The stated impact is denial of service, meaning a local attacker could crash or disrupt availability rather than steal data. Public affected-version data is incomplete.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate availability risk for robotics or rover deployments that depend on affected ArduPilot code. It does not currently justify emergency enterprise-wide action without evidence of exposure, but operators should confirm build lineage and sensor usage promptly.

Technical view

The record cites CWE-120 and CWE-121 in AP_InertialSensor_ADIS1647x.cpp for ArduRover at commit c56439b045162058df0ff136afea3081fcd06d38. CVSS 3.1 is 6.2, local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, high availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to environments running affected ArduPilot Rover code using the ADIS1647x sensor component. The source bundle lists vendor, product, versions, and CPEs as n/a, so asset matching will require repository, build, and configuration review.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the supplied sources do not state active exploitation. The recorded vector is local, so practical risk depends on attacker access to the device, firmware environment, or deployment workflow.

Researcher notes

The public metadata is thin: affected vendor, product, versions, and CPEs are n/a. The analysis should remain bounded to the named commit, ArduRover, AP_InertialSensor_ADIS1647x.cpp, and ADIS1647x sensor component until upstream provides clearer affected ranges or fixes.

Mitigation direction

  • Review ArduPilot issue 27937 and vendor guidance for confirmed fixes or affected commits.
  • Inventory ArduRover deployments and identify builds based on the cited commit.
  • Prioritize systems using the ADIS1647x sensor component.
  • Restrict local access to rover controllers, maintenance ports, and build environments.
  • Monitor affected systems for unexplained crashes, resets, or sensor-related availability faults.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether deployed firmware includes the cited ArduPilot commit.
  • Check whether AP_InertialSensor_ADIS1647x.cpp is compiled into deployed builds.
  • Verify whether ADIS1647x hardware or configuration is present.
  • Review operational logs for denial-of-service symptoms tied to inertial sensor handling.
  • Track CVE and GitHub issue updates for corrected affected-version data.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-48519 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.2CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.53.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.2Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-48519Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.