In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling
Currently, Smack mirrors the label of incoming tcp/ipv4 connections:
when a label 'foo' connects to a label 'bar' with tcp/ipv4,
'foo' always gets 'foo' in returned ipv4 packets. So,
1) returned packets are incorrectly labeled ('foo' instead of 'bar')
2) 'bar' can write to 'foo' without being authorized to write.
Here is a scenario how to see this:
* Take two machines, let's call them C and S,
with active Smack in the default state
(no settings, no rules, no labeled hosts, only builtin labels)
* At S, add Smack rule 'foo bar w'
(labels 'foo' and 'bar' are instantiated at S at this moment)
* At S, at label 'bar', launch a program
that listens for incoming tcp/ipv4 connections
* From C, at label 'foo', connect to the listener at S.
(label 'foo' is instantiated at C at this moment)
Connection succeedes and works.
* Send some data in both directions.
* Collect network traffic of this connection.
All packets in both directions are labeled with the CIPSO
of the label 'foo'. Hence, label 'bar' writes to 'foo' without
being authorized, and even without ever being known at C.
If anybody cares: exactly the same happens with DCCP.
This behavior 1st manifested in release 2.6.29.4 (see Fixes below)
and it looks unintentional. At least, no explanation was provided.
I changed returned packes label into the 'bar',
to bring it into line with the Smack documentation claims.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A Linux Smack labeling flaw can mislabel return traffic on TCP/IPv4 connections. This may let a service under one security label send data to another label without the required authorization, undermining confidentiality and integrity controls. Systems not using Smack for labeled network enforcement are unlikely to be exposed.
Executive priority
Treat as urgent where Smack enforces sensitive network separation because the flaw can bypass confidentiality and integrity boundaries remotely. For systems without active Smack-labeled networking, priority can be lower after confirming non-exposure. Require owners to document applicability and vendor-patch status.
Technical view
Smack incorrectly mirrored the incoming peer label onto returned TCP/IPv4 packets instead of applying the responder's label. Consequently, traffic from label “bar” could carry label “foo,” bypassing an intended write restriction. The source reports equivalent DCCP behavior and says the issue first appeared in Linux 2.6.29.4.
Likely exposure
Exposure is concentrated in Linux systems with Smack active and relied upon for CIPSO-based network separation over TCP/IPv4; DCCP may also be affected. The supplied version data lists multiple kernel branches through 6.11 as affected, but does not provide sufficiently clear distribution-specific fixed-version mapping.
Exploitation context
The supplied CVSS is 9.1 and describes network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation without privileges or user interaction. However, exploitation requires a relevant Smack-labeled networking configuration and reachable service. The bundle states this CVE is not in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation.
Researcher notes
The defect concerns incorrect security-label propagation, not memory corruption. The source demonstrates an authorization bypass caused by response packets retaining the initiator's label. Stable-kernel commits are supplied, but exact affected and fixed package versions should be resolved through the relevant Linux distributor. No exploit campaign or public weaponization evidence is provided.
Mitigation direction
Identify systems using Smack and CIPSO-based labeled networking.
Apply a vendor-supported kernel containing the referenced stable fix.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2024-47659 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.