LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-47659: smack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smack: tcp: ipv4, fix incorrect labeling Currently, Smack mirrors the label of incoming tcp/ipv4 connections: when a label 'foo' connects to a label 'bar' with tcp/ipv4, 'foo' always gets 'foo' in returned ipv4 packets. So, 1) returned packets are incorrectly labeled ('foo' instead of 'bar') 2) 'bar' can write to 'foo' without being authorized to write. Here is a scenario how to see this: * Take two machines, let's call them C and S, with active Smack in the default state (no settings, no rules, no labeled hosts, only builtin labels) * At S, add Smack rule 'foo bar w' (labels 'foo' and 'bar' are instantiated at S at this moment) * At S, at label 'bar', launch a program that listens for incoming tcp/ipv4 connections * From C, at label 'foo', connect to the listener at S. (label 'foo' is instantiated at C at this moment) Connection succeedes and works. * Send some data in both directions. * Collect network traffic of this connection. All packets in both directions are labeled with the CIPSO of the label 'foo'. Hence, label 'bar' writes to 'foo' without being authorized, and even without ever being known at C. If anybody cares: exactly the same happens with DCCP. This behavior 1st manifested in release 2.6.29.4 (see Fixes below) and it looks unintentional. At least, no explanation was provided. I changed returned packes label into the 'bar', to bring it into line with the Smack documentation claims.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Linux Smack labeling flaw can mislabel return traffic on TCP/IPv4 connections. This may let a service under one security label send data to another label without the required authorization, undermining confidentiality and integrity controls. Systems not using Smack for labeled network enforcement are unlikely to be exposed.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent where Smack enforces sensitive network separation because the flaw can bypass confidentiality and integrity boundaries remotely. For systems without active Smack-labeled networking, priority can be lower after confirming non-exposure. Require owners to document applicability and vendor-patch status.

Technical view

Smack incorrectly mirrored the incoming peer label onto returned TCP/IPv4 packets instead of applying the responder's label. Consequently, traffic from label “bar” could carry label “foo,” bypassing an intended write restriction. The source reports equivalent DCCP behavior and says the issue first appeared in Linux 2.6.29.4.

Likely exposure

Exposure is concentrated in Linux systems with Smack active and relied upon for CIPSO-based network separation over TCP/IPv4; DCCP may also be affected. The supplied version data lists multiple kernel branches through 6.11 as affected, but does not provide sufficiently clear distribution-specific fixed-version mapping.

Exploitation context

The supplied CVSS is 9.1 and describes network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation without privileges or user interaction. However, exploitation requires a relevant Smack-labeled networking configuration and reachable service. The bundle states this CVE is not in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The defect concerns incorrect security-label propagation, not memory corruption. The source demonstrates an authorization bypass caused by response packets retaining the initiator's label. Stable-kernel commits are supplied, but exact affected and fixed package versions should be resolved through the relevant Linux distributor. No exploit campaign or public weaponization evidence is provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify systems using Smack and CIPSO-based labeled networking.
  • Apply a vendor-supported kernel containing the referenced stable fix.
  • Prioritize exposed services crossing Smack label boundaries.
  • Check distribution advisories for exact fixed package versions.
  • Restrict affected labeled network paths until updates are validated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Smack is active on each Linux host.
  • Inventory kernel and distribution package versions against vendor advisories.
  • Verify the installed kernel includes the applicable referenced fix.
  • Test that response packets carry the responder's expected Smack label.
  • Confirm unauthorized cross-label writes are denied after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-47659 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
10Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N3.95.2Linux

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-47659Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinux07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962, 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962, 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962, 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962, 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962, 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962, 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962, 07feee8f812f7327a46186f7604df312c8c81962unaffected
LinuxLinux2.6.30, 0, 4.19.322, 5.4.284, 5.10.226, 5.15.167, 6.1.109, 6.6.50, 6.10.9, 6.11affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.