LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-45619: Libopensc: incorrect handling length of buffers or files in libopensc

A vulnerability was found in OpenSC, OpenSC tools, PKCS#11 module, minidriver, and CTK. An attacker could use a crafted USB Device or Smart Card, which would present the system with a specially crafted response to APDUs. When buffers are partially filled with data, initialized parts of the buffer can be incorrectly accessed.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects OpenSC software used for smart cards and USB security tokens. A malicious card or USB device could trigger incorrect buffer handling when the system processes card responses. The impact is limited by needing physical device interaction, but it matters for environments using smart-card authentication or shared workstations.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted, physical-access risk rather than an internet-scale emergency. Prioritize environments where smart cards or USB security tokens are used for authentication, especially shared workstations, privileged admin endpoints, and regulated access-control workflows.

Technical view

CVE-2024-45619 is a CWE-120 buffer handling issue in OpenSC, OpenSC tools, PKCS#11 module, minidriver, CTK, and libopensc. Crafted APDU responses from a USB device or smart card can cause incorrect access to partially filled buffers. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3 with physical attack vector and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems using OpenSC/libopensc for smart-card or token workflows, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, 8, 9, and 10 opensc packages. The source bundle does not provide exact affected or fixed version ranges.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The described attack requires a crafted USB device or smart card that can present malicious APDU responses, so risk is concentrated around physical access, untrusted tokens, and shared endpoint environments.

Researcher notes

The evidence identifies affected components and Red Hat product families, but the bundle does not include precise fixed versions. Do not assume exploit availability. Focus validation on installed OpenSC packages, smart-card middleware paths, and vendor advisories linked in the source bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Review vendor guidance for OpenSC, Red Hat, and Debian package fixes.
  • Update opensc/libopensc packages where vendor security updates are available.
  • Restrict use of untrusted smart cards, USB tokens, and readers.
  • Prioritize endpoints using smart-card authentication or token middleware.
  • Document any compensating controls for systems awaiting vendor fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems with OpenSC, libopensc, PKCS#11, minidriver, or CTK installed.
  • Check Red Hat RHEL 7, 8, 9, and 10 opensc advisory status.
  • Review Debian LTS guidance if Debian-based systems are in scope.
  • Confirm endpoint policies limit untrusted smart-card and USB token use.
  • Verify package versions after updates through standard asset tooling.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-45619 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L0.93.4redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-45619Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibopensclibopenscaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10openscaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7openscaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8openscaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9openscaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.