CVE-2024-41075: cachefiles: add consistency check for copen/cread
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cachefiles: add consistency check for copen/cread
This prevents malicious processes from completing random copen/cread
requests and crashing the system. Added checks are listed below:
* Generic, copen can only complete open requests, and cread can only
complete read requests.
* For copen, ondemand_id must not be 0, because this indicates that the
request has not been read by the daemon.
* For cread, the object corresponding to fd and req should be the same.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A locally authenticated malicious process may abuse Linux CacheFiles request handling and crash the system. The flaw received a 7.8 CVSS score. Systems allowing untrusted local users or workloads deserve prompt review, especially where CacheFiles functionality is active.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority local kernel issue, not an internet-wide emergency. Accelerate remediation for shared hosts, multi-tenant infrastructure, and systems where local compromise could cause material outages. Standard managed endpoints should follow expedited kernel patching after exposure confirmation.
Technical view
CacheFiles lacked consistency checks when completing copen and cread requests. The fix verifies request type, rejects a zero ondemand_id for copen, and ensures cread file descriptors and requests reference the same object. This prevents arbitrary request completion from reaching unsafe state and crashing the kernel.
Likely exposure
Exposure requires an affected Linux kernel and local low-privilege access. Risk is most relevant where CacheFiles copen/cread paths are available. The supplied version data is ambiguous, so confirm exposure against the running distribution's advisory and backport status rather than relying solely on upstream version numbers.
Exploitation context
The supplied record does not list this CVE in KEV and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. It describes a malicious local process causing a system crash; remote, unauthenticated exploitation is not supported by the provided evidence.
Researcher notes
The record identifies missing semantic validation across CacheFiles copen/cread completions. Available evidence supports a local crash scenario, while the CVSS vector claims high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts without explaining those outcomes. Do not infer privilege escalation or data disclosure without additional evidence.
Mitigation direction
Update to a vendor-supported kernel containing the relevant upstream fix or distribution backport.
Prioritize multi-user and multi-tenant systems where untrusted processes have local access.
Check Linux distribution guidance for exact affected packages and reboot requirements.
Restrict unnecessary local access while patching is pending.
Validation and detection
Record the running kernel and installed kernel package versions.
Compare package versions with the applicable distribution security advisory.
Confirm whether CacheFiles functionality is configured or operational on each system.
Verify the installed kernel contains the relevant upstream fix or documented backport.
After updating, confirm systems booted into the corrected kernel.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2024-41075 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.