LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-4027: Undertow: outofmemoryerror in httpservletrequestimpl.getparameternames() can cause remote dos attacks

A flaw was found in Undertow. Servlets using a method that calls HttpServletRequestImpl.getParameterNames() can cause an OutOfMemoryError when the client sends a request with large parameter names. This issue can be exploited by an unauthorized user to cause a remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-4027 is a remote denial-of-service flaw in Undertow. An unauthenticated client can send requests with very large parameter names, causing memory exhaustion in applications that call parameter-name enumeration. The business impact is service outage, not data theft or code execution.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for exposed services where downtime has material business impact. This is not currently evidenced as exploited, but unauthenticated remote DoS risk justifies fast inventory, vendor-status confirmation, and maintenance planning.

Technical view

The flaw is in Undertow servlet request parameter handling, specifically HttpServletRequestImpl.getParameterNames(). Large parameter names can trigger OutOfMemoryError. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5 high: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, availability impact only. CWE-20 is listed.

Likely exposure

Most relevant exposure is Undertow-backed servlet applications and Red Hat products marked affected: Apicurio Registry 2, Fuse 7, Integration Camel K 1, and Process Automation 7. Several listed products have unknown status, so asset-specific verification is required.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. The issue is still operationally serious because it is unauthenticated, network reachable, and targets availability through memory exhaustion.

Researcher notes

Avoid assuming all Undertow deployments are affected from the bundle alone. Product statuses vary: some are affected, some unaffected, and several unknown. The provided sources do not name exact fixed versions or a universal mitigation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Undertow and Red Hat products listed in the CVE/VEX records.
  • Check Red Hat guidance for affected status, errata, and supported fixed packages.
  • Prioritize internet-facing or unauthenticated servlet applications for remediation planning.
  • Apply vendor-supported updates when Red Hat publishes applicable fixes.
  • Review platform-supported request size and parameter controls before changing production limits.

Validation and detection

  • Map deployed products against the Red Hat CVE and CSAF VEX status.
  • Confirm whether applications use Undertow servlet handling or quarkus-undertow.
  • Identify routes that enumerate request parameter names in servlet request processing.
  • Review monitoring for OutOfMemoryError events or unexplained availability drops.
  • Retest after vendor updates using non-destructive availability and regression checks.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-4027 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
2ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-4027Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  5. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  6. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  7. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPundertow: OutOfMemoryError in HttpServletRequestImpl.getParameterNames() can cause remote DoS attacks
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2024-04-22T00:00:00.000Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-01-30T14:00:00.000Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatOpenShift Serverlessundertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 3undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2undertowaffected
Red HatRed Hat Build of Keycloakundertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of OptaPlanner 8undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of Quarkusio.quarkus/quarkus-undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat build of Quarkusio.quarkus/quarkus-undertowunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Data Grid 8undertowunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Fuse 7undertowaffected
Red HatRed Hat Integration Camel K 1undertowaffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Data Grid 7undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7undertowunaffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8undertowunaffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Packundertowunaffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Fuse Service Works 6undertowunknown
Red HatRed Hat Process Automation 7undertowaffected
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7undertowunaffected
Red Hatstreams for Apache Kafkaundertowunknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.