LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-38247: Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in the Windows Graphics Component could let a user who already has limited local access gain higher privileges. Successful exploitation could compromise data, alter systems, or disrupt availability. It is high severity, but the supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority patching issue because limited local access could become full system compromise. Prioritize high-value servers and multi-user endpoints. Emergency incident action is not supported solely by this bundle because active exploitation is not established.

Technical view

CVE-2024-38247 is a CWE-415 double-free vulnerability rated CVSS 3.1 7.8. The vector indicates local access, low complexity, existing low privileges, and no user interaction. Successful exploitation has high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact without crossing a security scope boundary.

Likely exposure

Exposure spans listed Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server releases, including several Server Core installations. Systems are relevant where an attacker can obtain low-privileged local access. The bundle provides baseline versions but not complete deployment-specific applicability or supersedence details.

Exploitation context

This is a local privilege-escalation issue, not a directly remote attack according to the CVSS vector. An attacker must already hold low-privileged access. The bundle marks the CVE as absent from KEV and contains no cited evidence of active exploitation or a public exploit.

Researcher notes

The supplied classification is CWE-415, indicating a double-free memory-management condition. CVSS metrics support a local, low-complexity, low-privilege path with no user interaction and high impact. The sources supplied here do not describe the vulnerable code path, exploit primitives, affected build ceilings, or exact update identifiers.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft’s CVE advisory for applicable security updates and deployment requirements.
  • Apply the applicable Microsoft security update through the organization’s approved patch process.
  • Prioritize shared workstations, servers, and systems where untrusted users can obtain local access.
  • Check vendor guidance for unsupported or extended-support Windows releases before selecting remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows editions, versions, and build numbers against Microsoft’s affected-product guidance.
  • Confirm the applicable Microsoft security update is installed and successfully reported by endpoint management.
  • Re-scan patched systems using current authenticated vulnerability checks.
  • Investigate systems that remain on affected builds or report failed update installation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-415: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-38247 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C1.85.9microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-38247Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 150710.0.10240.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 160710.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 180910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H210.0.19043.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H210.0.19045.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 21H210.0.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H210.0.22621.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H310.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 23H210.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 16.1.7601.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)6.1.7601.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 20126.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)6.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R26.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)6.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)10.0.25398.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-415 · source CWE mapping

Double Free

Double Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.