LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-37370: In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.21.3, an attacker can modify the plaintext Extra Count field of a con...

In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.21.3, an attacker can modify the plaintext Extra Count field of a confidential GSS krb5 wrap token, causing the unwrapped token to appear truncated to the application.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects MIT Kerberos 5 before 1.21.3. A network attacker could alter an unprotected field in a protected GSS Kerberos message so the receiving application sees the message as shorter than it really is. Business risk depends on where Kerberos GSS protected communications are used.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority patching item for environments that rely on Kerberos-secured service communication. The urgency is highest where MIT krb5 is embedded in externally reachable, cross-domain, or vendor-managed systems. No active exploitation is evidenced in the supplied sources.

Technical view

CVE-2024-37370 is a CWE-345 issue in krb5 GSS wrap token handling. The plaintext Extra Count field of a confidential GSS krb5 wrap token can be modified, causing the unwrap result to appear truncated to the application. The CVSS vector is network, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, confidentiality high.

Likely exposure

Organizations are most likely exposed through servers, clients, appliances, or embedded products using MIT krb5 versions before 1.21.3 for GSSAPI-protected Kerberos communications. The bundle lists NetApp and Siemens advisories, suggesting downstream vendor assessment is relevant, but affected products are not enumerated here.

Exploitation context

The provided bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The issue is remotely reachable under the CVSS assessment and requires no privileges or user interaction, but exposure depends on applications using confidential GSS krb5 wrap tokens.

Researcher notes

The key research question is whether an application’s protocol semantics become unsafe when a confidential GSS krb5 wrapped token is delivered as truncated plaintext. Validate exposure by implementation and version, not by the generic affected CPE data, which is incomplete in the supplied bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade MIT Kerberos 5 krb5 to version 1.21.3 or later where directly managed.
  • Review MIT advisory and the referenced upstream fix for authoritative remediation details.
  • Check NetApp and Siemens advisories for product-specific updates or mitigations.
  • Prioritize internet-facing or cross-trust Kerberos GSSAPI services first.
  • If no direct package update exists, obtain guidance from the affected vendor.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems and products that include MIT Kerberos 5 or krb5 libraries.
  • Confirm krb5 package versions and flag versions earlier than 1.21.3.
  • Identify applications using Kerberos GSSAPI confidentiality or wrap tokens.
  • Check vendor advisories for matching product names, versions, and fixed releases.
  • Verify patched hosts are using the updated krb5 libraries after restart or redeploy.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-37370 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
3ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-37370Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-345 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.