CVE-2024-3727: Containers/image: digest type does not guarantee valid type
A flaw was found in the github.com/containers/image library. This flaw allows attackers to trigger unexpected authenticated registry accesses on behalf of a victim user, causing resource exhaustion, local path traversal, and other attacks.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-3727 is a high-severity flaw in the containers/image library. A victim can be induced into unexpected authenticated container registry access, potentially causing resource exhaustion, local path traversal, or broader impact through affected products.
Executive priority
Treat as a priority patching item for container security and platform teams, especially in environments using Red Hat OADP or RHACS. No active exploitation is evidenced in the provided bundle, but business impact could be high.
Technical view
The issue is categorized as CWE-354, improper validation of integrity check value. The supplied CVSS vector is 8.3: network reachable, high complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, scope changed, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where containers/image versions through 5.30.0 are embedded, or where listed Red Hat OADP 1.3 and RHACS 4.4 or 4.5 packages are deployed.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation is assessed as higher complexity and requires user interaction, but the potential impact is significant because authenticated registry behavior may be abused.
Researcher notes
Evidence is strongest for the library flaw description, CVSS vector, CWE-354 classification, and Red Hat affected packages. The source bundle does not include exploit proof, detailed patch versions, or complete mitigation instructions.
Mitigation direction
Apply relevant Red Hat RHSA updates for affected OADP and RHACS packages.
Check vendor guidance for fixed containers/image versions before promoting builds.
Prioritize systems with registry credentials or automated image handling workflows.
Limit unnecessary registry credentials while remediation is pending.
Monitor vendor advisories for any revised affected-product or fix details.
Validation and detection
Inventory containers/image versions in applications, tools, and container build pipelines.
Check Red Hat OADP and RHACS package versions against the affected list.
Confirm applicable RHSA advisories are installed on managed Red Hat deployments.
Review registry access logs for unexpected authenticated requests from automation accounts.
Document compensating controls where patches cannot be applied immediately.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-354: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-354 · source CWE mapping
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.