CVE-2024-36893: usb: typec: tcpm: Check for port partner validity before consuming it
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: tcpm: Check for port partner validity before consuming it
typec_register_partner() does not guarantee partner registration
to always succeed. In the event of failure, port->partner is set
to the error value or NULL. Given that port->partner validity is
not checked, this results in the following crash:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address xx
pc : run_state_machine+0x1bc8/0x1c08
lr : run_state_machine+0x1b90/0x1c08
..
Call trace:
run_state_machine+0x1bc8/0x1c08
tcpm_state_machine_work+0x94/0xe4
kthread_worker_fn+0x118/0x328
kthread+0x1d0/0x23c
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
To prevent the crash, check for port->partner validity before
derefencing it in all the call sites.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This is a Linux kernel crash bug in USB Type-C power management. If partner registration fails, kernel code may still use an invalid or missing partner pointer, causing a NULL pointer dereference and system crash. The source bundle does not show remote code execution, privilege escalation, or confirmed exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat as a normal availability-focused kernel patching item unless affected systems support critical services or exposed physical USB-C interaction. No source evidence supports emergency response for active exploitation.
Technical view
The flaw is in the Linux kernel USB Type-C TCPM state machine. typec_register_partner() can fail and leave port->partner as NULL or an error value. Subsequent call sites dereference it without validation, producing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. The fix checks port->partner validity before use.
Likely exposure
Linux systems using affected kernel builds with USB Type-C TCPM support are the relevant exposure. Systems without that code path or without affected kernel versions are less likely exposed. Exact exposure depends on distribution backports and hardware configuration.
Exploitation context
CISA KEV status is false in the provided bundle, and no cited source reports active exploitation. The documented impact is a kernel crash, so business risk is primarily availability disruption on affected Linux hosts or devices.
Researcher notes
The evidence supports a missing validity check after typec_register_partner() failure. The public bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, exploitability details, or distribution-specific fixed package versions, so validation should rely on kernel commit inclusion and vendor backport tracking.
Mitigation direction
Apply Linux kernel updates that include the referenced stable fixes.
Use distribution vendor advisories to confirm the fixed package version.
Prioritize laptops, embedded devices, and servers with USB-C Type-C TCPM hardware.
If patching is delayed, review vendor guidance for temporary operational workarounds.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions across affected fleets.
Identify systems using USB Type-C TCPM-capable hardware or kernel configuration.
Confirm installed kernels include vendor backports for CVE-2024-36893.
Review system logs for related TCPM state machine kernel crashes.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2024-36893 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.