LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-36315: Improper enforcement of the LFENCE serialization property may allow an attacker to bypass speculation barri...

Improper enforcement of the LFENCE serialization property may allow an attacker to bypass speculation barriers and potentially disclose sensitive information, potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality.

MediumCVSS 5.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-36315 affects listed AMD processor platforms where LFENCE may not reliably stop speculative execution. A local, low-privileged attacker could potentially bypass speculation barriers and expose sensitive information. The issue is confidentiality-focused and rated medium, with difficult exploitation conditions.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority hardware confidentiality issue. It is not remotely exploitable based on the supplied CVSS data, but it matters for shared systems, high-value workloads, and environments where local code from less-trusted users can run.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-693 improper protection mechanism enforcement involving LFENCE serialization. CVSS 4.0 is 5.7: local attack vector, high complexity, attack requirements present, low privileges, no user interaction, and high vulnerable-system confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to systems using the AMD processors and platform firmware versions listed in the source bundle, including affected EPYC, Ryzen, Embedded, and Instinct MI300A platforms. Shared compute and environments running untrusted local workloads deserve priority review.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Exploitation requires local access with low privileges and difficult prerequisite conditions, but successful abuse could disclose sensitive information across affected system boundaries.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on processor family, platform firmware lineage, and workload trust boundaries. The public bundle identifies affected products and versions but does not provide proof-of-concept details or complete remediation specifics, so avoid assuming exploitability beyond the CVE and AMD notices.

Mitigation direction

  • Review AMD SB-3030 and SB-4017 for vendor remediation guidance.
  • Check OEM platform firmware advisories for affected server, desktop, mobile, and embedded systems.
  • Prioritize shared compute hosts and systems running untrusted local workloads.
  • Track firmware remediation status in asset and vulnerability management records.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory AMD CPU models across servers, workstations, laptops, and embedded systems.
  • Compare platform firmware or PI versions against the affected versions listed for CVE-2024-36315.
  • Confirm whether each hardware vendor has released applicable firmware guidance.
  • Document systems awaiting vendor fixes or maintenance windows.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-693: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-36315 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.7CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NAMD

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.7Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2024-36315Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AMDAMD EPYC™ Series 9004 ProcessorsGenoaPI_1.0.0.Eaffected
AMDAMD EPYC™Series 4004 ProcessorsComboAM5PI_1.0.0.a/ ComboAM5PI_1.1.0.3c/ ComboAM5PI_1.2.0.3affected
AMDAMD EPYC™ 8004 Series ProcessorsGenoaPI_1.0.0.Eaffected
AMDAMD Instinct™ MI300A Series ProcessorsMI300PI 1.0.0.7affected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ Z1 Series ProcessorsComboAM5PI_1.2.0.3, ComboAM5PI_1.1.0.3c, ComboAM5PI_1.0.0.aaffected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ 7040 Series Mobile Processors with Radeon™ GraphicsPhoenixPI-FP8-FP7_1.2.0.0affected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ 7045 Series Mobile Processors with Radeon™ GraphicsDragonRangeFL1_1.0.0.3gaffected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ 9000 Series Desktop ProcessorsComboAM5PI_1.2.0.3affected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ 7000 Series Desktop ProcessorsComboAM5PI_1.0.0.a, ComboAM5PI_1.1.0.3c, ComboAM5PI_1.2.0.3affected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ 8000 Series Desktop ProcessorsComboAM5PI_1.1.0.3c, ComboAM5PI_1.2.0.3affected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ 7000 Series Desktop Processors (formerly codenamed "Raphael")ComboAM5PI_1.3.0.0affected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ 8000 Series Desktop Processors (formerly codenamed "Phoenix")ComboAM5PI_1.3.0.0affected
AMDAMD EPYC™ Embedded 9004 Series Processors (formerly codenamed "Genoa")EmbGenoaPI-SP5 1.0.0.Daffected
AMDAMD EPYC™ Embedded 8004 Series ProcessorsEmbGenoaPI-SP5 1.0.0.Daffected
AMDAMD EPYC™ Embedded 9004 Series Processors (formerly codenamed "Bergamo")EmbGenoaPI-SP5 1.0.0.Daffected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ Embedded 8000 Series ProcessorsEmbeddedPhoenixPI-FP7r2_1.0.0.3affected
AMDAMD Ryzen™ Embedded 7000 Series ProcessorsEmbeddedAM5PI 1.0.0.5affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-693 · source CWE mapping

Protection Mechanism Failure

Protection Mechanism Failure represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.