LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-33602: nscd: netgroup cache assumes NSS callback uses in-buffer strings

nscd: netgroup cache assumes NSS callback uses in-buffer strings The Name Service Cache Daemon's (nscd) netgroup cache can corrupt memory when the NSS callback does not store all strings in the provided buffer. The flaw was introduced in glibc 2.15 when the cache was added to nscd. This vulnerability is only present in the nscd binary.

HighCVSS 7.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-33602 is a glibc nscd memory corruption flaw in the netgroup cache. It matters because a successful local attack could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The provided sources do not show active exploitation, and the issue is limited to the nscd binary.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority infrastructure hygiene issue for systems running nscd. It is not currently supported by KEV evidence for emergency exploitation response, but affected platforms should be patched or de-risked through vendor-approved guidance.

Technical view

nscd’s netgroup cache assumes NSS callback strings are stored in a provided buffer. When an NSS backend does not do that, nscd can corrupt memory. The flaw was introduced with the netgroup cache in glibc 2.15 and is reported as only present in nscd.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux systems or appliances using glibc nscd with netgroup caching enabled. Systems not running nscd are not indicated as affected by the provided sources. Product-specific exposure should follow vendor advisories from Debian, NetApp, Siemens, or the applicable platform vendor.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates local attack requirements, high attack complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. KEV status is false, and the supplied sources do not provide evidence of active exploitation or public weaponization.

Researcher notes

The key constraint is scope: sources state the vulnerability is only present in nscd. The bundle does not define a complete affected version range beyond introduction in glibc 2.15, so version conclusions should come from vendor advisories or package changelogs.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply vendor glibc or nscd security updates where available.
  • Check Debian, NetApp, Siemens, or platform vendor advisories for product-specific fixes.
  • Disable or stop nscd if not required by business operations.
  • Review whether netgroup caching is enabled and needed.
  • Prioritize internet-facing appliances only if vendor guidance confirms exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems and appliances that include glibc nscd.
  • Confirm whether the nscd binary is installed and running.
  • Check glibc package versions against vendor security advisories.
  • Review nscd configuration for netgroup cache usage.
  • Track remediation status through package management or vendor firmware records.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-466: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-33602 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
3ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.45.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.4High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-33602Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
The GNU C Libraryglibc2.15unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-466 · source CWE mapping

Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range

Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.