CVE-2024-31064: Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Insurance Mangement System v.1.0.0 and before allows a remote attacke...
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Insurance Mangement System v.1.0.0 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the First Name input field.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-31064 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting issue in Insurance Mangement System v1.0.0 and earlier. A remote attacker could abuse the First Name field to run script in a user's browser. Business impact is mainly session, data, or workflow compromise where the affected application is used.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate web application risk. Prioritize if the application is internet-facing, handles customer data, or is used by privileged staff. The absence of KEV evidence lowers urgency, but incomplete product metadata increases the need for local verification.
Technical view
The record maps to CWE-79 with CVSS 3.1 score 6.1: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, and low confidentiality/integrity impact. Vendor and CPE data are listed as n/a, so asset matching requires application-level confirmation.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Insurance Mangement System v1.0.0 or earlier. Public-facing registration, customer, or administrative forms using the First Name field would be the primary review area. The source data does not provide vendor, CPE, or deployment details.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Exploitation is described as remote but requires user interaction under the CVSS vector. The CVE wording says arbitrary code, but the CWE and vector support browser-side XSS impact, not confirmed server code execution.
Researcher notes
The public record is sparse: affected vendor/product fields are n/a, with external references to Google Drive and GitHub. Confidence is limited by missing authoritative vendor advisory, patch status, and exact exploit type details beyond the First Name field.
Mitigation direction
Check the project or vendor source for fixed release guidance.
Upgrade if a maintained patched version is available.
Apply server-side validation and output encoding to name fields.
Review Content Security Policy as defense in depth.
Limit administrative access to trusted networks where feasible.
Validation and detection
Inventory systems for Insurance Mangement System v1.0.0 or earlier.
Confirm whether First Name input is rendered back to users or administrators.
Review application code for missing encoding around user-supplied names.
Check logs for suspicious First Name field submissions.
Verify any remediation with a non-destructive XSS test case.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-79 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.