LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-30092: Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

HighCVSS 8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-30092 is a high-severity Windows Hyper-V remote code execution vulnerability. It affects many supported Windows client and server releases. Microsoft lists an official fix. The available bundle does not show known active exploitation or CISA KEV listing, but successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Hyper-V systems.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation in normal high-severity patch cycles, faster for production Hyper-V hosts or shared virtualization infrastructure. The business risk is high because successful exploitation could enable full compromise of affected virtualization systems, but current supplied evidence does not indicate active exploitation.

Technical view

The CVSS 3.1 vector is 8.0: adjacent attack vector, high complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and high CIA impact. The weaknesses are CWE-20 and CWE-829. Affected products include Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2016, 2019, 2022, and Server Core variants.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to organizations running Hyper-V on affected Windows client or server builds, including virtualization hosts and Server Core deployments. Systems not using Hyper-V may have lower practical exposure, but the source bundle does not provide feature-state conditions.

Exploitation context

The provided CVSS says exploitation requires adjacent access, low privileges, and high complexity, with no user interaction. Microsoft marks exploit code maturity as unproven in the supplied vector, and the bundle says CISA KEV is false. No cited source here supports active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Key constraints are AV:A, AC:H, PR:L, UI:N, and changed scope. Research should focus on Hyper-V-enabled affected builds, patch presence, and whether adjacent attacker paths exist. Do not assume internet-routable exploitation from the provided vector alone.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply Microsoft’s official update for CVE-2024-30092.
  • Prioritize Hyper-V hosts running listed Windows Server and client versions.
  • Check MSRC for product-specific update packages and supersedence.
  • If patching is delayed, treat affected Hyper-V hosts as high-risk assets.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows systems with Hyper-V enabled or hosting virtualization workloads.
  • Compare OS versions against the affected product list in the source bundle.
  • Verify the applicable Microsoft security update is installed.
  • Confirm unsupported or unpatched builds are tracked for remediation.
  • Document systems where Hyper-V exposure cannot be confirmed.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-829: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-30092 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C1.36microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-30092Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 150710.0.10240.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 160710.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 180910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H210.0.19043.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H210.0.19045.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 21H210.0.22000.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H210.0.22621.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H310.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 23H210.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)10.0.25398.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-829 · source CWE mapping

Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere

Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.