Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A spoofing flaw in Microsoft Edge for iOS could cause users to trust misleading browser content or presentation. Successful exploitation requires user interaction and may have limited confidentiality and integrity impact, but no availability impact. The supplied evidence does not describe the precise spoofing behavior.
Executive priority
Schedule near-term remediation through normal vulnerability-management processes. An emergency response is not supported by the supplied evidence because impact is limited, user interaction is required, and active exploitation is not established. Increase urgency where Edge for iOS supports sensitive or privileged workflows.
Technical view
CVE-2024-30057 is classified under CWE-356 and scored CVSS 3.1 at 5.4. The vector indicates remote reachability, low complexity, no required privileges, required user interaction, unchanged scope, and low confidentiality and integrity impact. The bundle identifies Edge for iOS version 1.0.0.0, but provides no complete affected-version range or technical root cause.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to Microsoft Edge for iOS installations covered by Microsoft’s affected-version guidance. The bundle lists version 1.0.0.0, but this alone is insufficient to determine the complete vulnerable population. Organizations permitting Edge on managed or unmanaged iOS devices should inventory versions and consult MSRC.
Exploitation context
The CVSS vector requires a user to interact with attacker-controlled or misleading content. The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. This does not prove exploitation has never occurred; it means active exploitation is unsupported by the supplied evidence.
Researcher notes
The source bundle contains no root-cause analysis, proof of concept, exploitation telemetry, or explicit fixed-build number. CVSS reports official remediation availability and unproven exploit maturity. Researchers should rely on Microsoft’s advisory for version boundaries and avoid treating the single listed version as a complete affected range.
Mitigation direction
- Review the MSRC advisory for the exact corrected Edge for iOS release and deployment guidance.
- Update affected Edge for iOS installations through Microsoft’s official distribution channel.
- Prioritize devices used for privileged administration, financial activity, or sensitive-data access.
- Advise users to treat unexpected browser identity or presentation changes cautiously until updates are verified.
Validation and detection
- Inventory Microsoft Edge for iOS installations and their installed versions.
- Compare installed versions against Microsoft’s current affected and corrected release guidance.
- Verify managed devices report successful installation of the corrected release.
- Confirm unsupported or unverified installations are tracked for remediation or restricted use.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-356: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2024-30057 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.4 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C2.82.5microsoftVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
5.4MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- Microsoft Edge for iOS Spoofing VulnerabilityCVE reference, microsoft · vendor-advisory, patch
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Product UI does not Warn User of Unsafe Actions
Product UI does not Warn User of Unsafe Actions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.