CVE-2024-28085: wall in util-linux through 2.40, often installed with setgid tty permissions, allows escape sequences to be...
wall in util-linux through 2.40, often installed with setgid tty permissions, allows escape sequences to be sent to other users' terminals through argv. (Specifically, escape sequences received from stdin are blocked, but escape sequences received from argv are not blocked.) There may be plausible scenarios where this leads to account takeover.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-28085 affects the wall utility in util-linux through 2.40. A local logged-in user may send terminal escape sequences to another user through command arguments. The direct CVSS impact is low, but shared shell servers deserve attention because terminal manipulation can support deception or account-compromise scenarios.
Executive priority
Handle through normal patch management, with earlier attention for shared interactive Linux environments. This is not KEV-listed in the supplied bundle, but local-user abuse can matter on bastions or multi-tenant systems.
Technical view
wall filters escape sequences from stdin but not from argv. On systems where wall is installed with setgid tty permissions, a low-privileged local user can write crafted terminal control sequences to other users' terminals. CVSS is 3.3, local attack vector, low integrity impact.
Likely exposure
Linux and Unix-like systems using util-linux wall through 2.40 are most relevant, especially multi-user servers where wall is setgid tty and untrusted users share interactive terminals.
Exploitation context
The bundle includes public researcher writeups and a public proof-of-concept repository. It does not include KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
The key condition is argv-based terminal escape handling combined with wall's ability to write to other terminals. Validate vendor patches or backports rather than relying only on upstream version strings. Avoid assuming remote exposure from the supplied evidence.
Mitigation direction
Update util-linux using vendor packages or vendor guidance.
Prioritize shared shell, bastion, lab, and hosting systems.
Check whether wall remains setgid tty where not operationally required.
Review Debian, Siemens, NetApp, and distribution advisories for product-specific status.
Restrict local shell access to trusted users where practical.
Validation and detection
Inventory systems with util-linux wall installed.
Confirm util-linux versions and vendor backport status.
Check wall file permissions for setgid tty exposure.
Review local multi-user terminal use cases and trust boundaries.
Confirm vendor security updates are applied successfully.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-150: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-150 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences
Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.