LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-28085: wall in util-linux through 2.40, often installed with setgid tty permissions, allows escape sequences to be...

wall in util-linux through 2.40, often installed with setgid tty permissions, allows escape sequences to be sent to other users' terminals through argv. (Specifically, escape sequences received from stdin are blocked, but escape sequences received from argv are not blocked.) There may be plausible scenarios where this leads to account takeover.

LowCVSS 3.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-28085 affects the wall utility in util-linux through 2.40. A local logged-in user may send terminal escape sequences to another user through command arguments. The direct CVSS impact is low, but shared shell servers deserve attention because terminal manipulation can support deception or account-compromise scenarios.

Executive priority

Handle through normal patch management, with earlier attention for shared interactive Linux environments. This is not KEV-listed in the supplied bundle, but local-user abuse can matter on bastions or multi-tenant systems.

Technical view

wall filters escape sequences from stdin but not from argv. On systems where wall is installed with setgid tty permissions, a low-privileged local user can write crafted terminal control sequences to other users' terminals. CVSS is 3.3, local attack vector, low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Linux and Unix-like systems using util-linux wall through 2.40 are most relevant, especially multi-user servers where wall is setgid tty and untrusted users share interactive terminals.

Exploitation context

The bundle includes public researcher writeups and a public proof-of-concept repository. It does not include KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The key condition is argv-based terminal escape handling combined with wall's ability to write to other terminals. Validate vendor patches or backports rather than relying only on upstream version strings. Avoid assuming remote exposure from the supplied evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Update util-linux using vendor packages or vendor guidance.
  • Prioritize shared shell, bastion, lab, and hosting systems.
  • Check whether wall remains setgid tty where not operationally required.
  • Review Debian, Siemens, NetApp, and distribution advisories for product-specific status.
  • Restrict local shell access to trusted users where practical.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems with util-linux wall installed.
  • Confirm util-linux versions and vendor backport status.
  • Check wall file permissions for setgid tty exposure.
  • Review local multi-user terminal use cases and trust boundaries.
  • Confirm vendor security updates are applied successfully.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
11

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-150: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-28085 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
3ADP providers
10Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.3CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N1.81.4CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.3Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-28085Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-150 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences

Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.