LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-27620: An issue in Ladder v.0.0.1 thru v.0.0.21 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a cra...

An issue in Ladder v.0.0.1 thru v.0.0.21 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request to the API.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-27620 is a high-severity information disclosure issue in Ladder versions 0.0.1 through 0.0.21. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can use a crafted API request to make the service expose sensitive information. The sources do not identify a confirmed fixed version or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as high for any internet-facing or partner-facing Ladder deployment. The main business risk is sensitive information exposure without authentication. Urgency is lower only if Ladder is not present, is isolated, or the API is not reachable by untrusted users.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-918 server-side request forgery in Ladder 0.0.1-0.0.21. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, high confidentiality impact, no integrity or availability impact. The affected CPE/vendor metadata is incomplete.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Ladder 0.0.1-0.0.21 is deployed with its API reachable from untrusted networks. Because the CVE affected-product metadata lists vendor and product as n/a, teams should verify by asset inventory rather than relying only on scanner CPE matching.

Exploitation context

The source bundle includes a Packet Storm reference for Ladder 0.0.21 SSRF, indicating public vulnerability details exist. The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided sources do not confirm active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited but consistent: CVE description, CWE-918, CVSS vector, and Packet Storm reference all point to unauthenticated SSRF-driven disclosure. The CVE record lacks useful CPE/vendor data and does not name a patch, so validation should focus on deployed versions and exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Ladder deployments and record exact versions.
  • Restrict Ladder API access to trusted networks or authenticated users.
  • Review project or vendor guidance for fixed versions or official workarounds.
  • Limit server outbound access to internal services and metadata endpoints.
  • Monitor API logs for unusual crafted requests or unexpected outbound fetches.

Validation and detection

  • Search asset inventory for Ladder installations and exposed API endpoints.
  • Confirm whether any instance runs versions 0.0.1 through 0.0.21.
  • Check internet-facing routes, reverse proxies, and firewall rules for API exposure.
  • Review egress controls from Ladder hosts to sensitive internal addresses.
  • Look for abnormal API requests and unexpected server-side outbound connections.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-27620 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-27620Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.