LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-26757: md: Don't ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery()

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: Don't ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery() Usually if the array is not read-write, md_check_recovery() won't register new sync_thread in the first place. And if the array is read-write and sync_thread is registered, md_set_readonly() will unregister sync_thread before setting the array read-only. md/raid follow this behavior hence there is no problem. After commit f52f5c71f3d4 ("md: fix stopping sync thread"), following hang can be triggered by test shell/integrity-caching.sh: 1) array is read-only. dm-raid update super block: rs_update_sbs ro = mddev->ro mddev->ro = 0 -> set array read-write md_update_sb 2) register new sync thread concurrently. 3) dm-raid set array back to read-only: rs_update_sbs mddev->ro = ro 4) stop the array: raid_dtr md_stop stop_sync_thread set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery); md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev->sync_thread); wait_event(..., !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) 5) sync thread done: md_do_sync set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery); md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread); 6) daemon thread can't unregister sync thread: md_check_recovery if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) && !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery)) return; -> -> MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can't be cleared, hence step 4 hang; The root cause is that dm-raid manipulate 'mddev->ro' by itself, however, dm-raid really should stop sync thread before setting the array read-only. Unfortunately, I need to read more code before I can refacter the handler of 'mddev->ro' in dm-raid, hence let's fix the problem the easy way for now to prevent dm-raid regression.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Linux kernel flaw can make certain RAID storage operations hang, creating an availability risk. It requires local privileges and affects systems using md RAID or dm-raid behavior on affected kernels. The sources do not indicate data theft, data modification, remote exploitation, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted availability risk for Linux storage infrastructure, not a broad remote-compromise emergency. Prioritize patching where affected RAID configurations support critical services or recovery operations.

Technical view

In md_check_recovery(), a read-only array path can skip unregistering a sync thread after dm-raid temporarily toggles mddev->ro. MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING may remain set, causing md_stop to wait indefinitely. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-404 with CVSS 5.5, reflecting local, low-complexity, privileged availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux systems using md RAID or dm-raid arrays with affected kernel versions. Internet-facing status is not the key factor; local access and storage stack configuration matter more. Systems without affected RAID functionality are less likely to be exposed.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing is provided, and the source bundle does not cite active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates local access with low privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact only. Evidence supports a denial-of-service style hang, not confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Researcher notes

The root issue is a recovery-state cleanup gap when dm-raid manipulates mddev->ro directly. The public description ties the regression to commit f52f5c71f3d4 and fixes the behavior in md_check_recovery(). Source evidence is sufficient for availability impact, but not for exploit prevalence.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply vendor kernel updates that include the referenced stable fixes.
  • Prioritize hosts using md RAID or dm-raid for production storage.
  • Check Linux distribution advisories for backported fixes and package names.
  • Restrict unnecessary local shell access on storage-sensitive systems.
  • Plan maintenance windows for kernel updates on affected RAID hosts.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux kernel versions across servers and appliances.
  • Identify hosts using md RAID or dm-raid arrays.
  • Confirm whether installed kernels include the referenced stable commits.
  • Review operational records for hangs during RAID stop or update workflows.
  • Track vendor advisory status for each affected Linux distribution.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-404: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-26757 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.83.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-26757Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxecbfb9f118bce49f571675929160e4ecef91cc8a, ecbfb9f118bce49f571675929160e4ecef91cc8aunaffected
LinuxLinux4.8, 0, 6.7.7, 6.8affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-404 · source CWE mapping

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.