LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-23086: Apfloat v1.10.1 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the component org.apfloat.internal.DoubleMod...

Apfloat v1.10.1 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the component org.apfloat.internal.DoubleModMath::modPow(double. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-23086 claims Apfloat v1.10.1 has a stack overflow in a math component. The CVE record itself says the finding is disputed by multiple third parties and may be based on unreliable tooling. Treat this as an item to verify, not as confirmed critical exposure.

Executive priority

Medium monitoring priority unless Apfloat v1.10.1 is confirmed in business-critical or internet-facing systems. The headline score is critical, but the evidence is disputed and no exploitation is cited.

Technical view

The reported issue concerns org.apfloat.internal.DoubleModMath::modPow(double) in Apfloat v1.10.1. The record assigns CVSS 9.8 and CWE-125, but affected vendor/product data is listed as n/a. The CVE description includes an explicit dispute over whether sufficient evidence exists to confirm a vulnerability.

Likely exposure

Organizations may be exposed only if they use Apfloat v1.10.1 or software that bundles it. The provided sources do not identify affected CPEs, downstream products, reachable attack surfaces, or fixed versions.

Exploitation context

No KEV listing is present, and the provided sources do not show active exploitation. The reported network, unauthenticated CVSS vector should not be treated as confirmed exploitability because the vulnerability itself is disputed.

Researcher notes

The CVE has unusual signals: n/a affected product metadata, CWE-125 while the description says stack overflow, and an explicit dispute statement. Validate dependency presence and code reachability before escalating. Do not assume the linked gist proves exploitability without independent confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications and dependencies for Apfloat v1.10.1 usage.
  • Review the upstream Apfloat repository and CVE record for clarification or fixes.
  • Avoid making risk decisions from the CVSS score alone due to the dispute.
  • If Apfloat is used in exposed services, prioritize code-owner review of reachable inputs.

Validation and detection

  • Check software bills of materials for Apfloat v1.10.1.
  • Confirm whether org.apfloat.internal.DoubleModMath is present in deployed builds.
  • Ask application owners whether untrusted input can reach Apfloat calculations.
  • Track CVE updates for changes to dispute status, affected versions, or remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-125: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-23086 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-23086Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-125 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Read

Out-of-bounds Read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.