LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-23082: ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8 was discovered to contain an integer overflow via the component org.threeten.bp.fo...

ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8 was discovered to contain an integer overflow via the component org.threeten.bp.format.DateTimeFormatter::parse(CharSequence, ParsePosition). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE claims an integer overflow in ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8 date parsing. The CVE record says the issue is disputed by multiple third parties and may come from weak tooling. There is no CVSS, no CPE, and no KEV listing. Treat it as a tracking item, not a confirmed emergency.

Executive priority

Low immediate urgency unless ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8 is widely used in externally facing parsing paths. Assign a dependency owner to verify usage and monitor upstream and CVE updates.

Technical view

The reported component is org.threeten.bp.format.DateTimeFormatter::parse(CharSequence, ParsePosition). The CVE record lists no CWE, CVSS, CPEs, or concrete affected vendor/product data. The existence of the vulnerability is explicitly disputed in the CVE description.

Likely exposure

Potential exposure is limited to applications using ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8, especially code paths parsing date/time strings. Exposure cannot be confirmed from CVE metadata because affected product and CPE fields are n/a and the issue is disputed.

Exploitation context

No cited source reports active exploitation, public exploitation in the wild, or CISA KEV inclusion. The public record describes a claimed integer overflow, but also states multiple third parties dispute whether sufficient evidence supports a vulnerability.

Researcher notes

Evidence quality is weak. The CVE itself flags dispute by multiple third parties and suggests the submission may rely on insufficient tooling. Avoid treating scanner hits as confirmed vulnerabilities without code-path evidence and upstream confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications and libraries for ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8 usage.
  • Check the ThreeTen Backport repository and CVE record for updated vendor guidance.
  • Prioritize review if date parsing processes external or user-controlled input.
  • Do not assume a patch exists unless confirmed by upstream guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether ThreeTen Backport v1.6.8 is present in dependency manifests.
  • Identify code paths using DateTimeFormatter.parse with ParsePosition.
  • Determine whether those paths receive untrusted input.
  • Track CVE updates for changes to disputed status, severity, or affected versions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-23082 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.