LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-21539: Versions of the package @eslint/plugin-kit before 0.2.3 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Serv...

Versions of the package @eslint/plugin-kit before 0.2.3 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) due to improper input sanitization. An attacker can increase the CPU usage and crash the program by exploiting this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in @eslint/plugin-kit versions before 0.2.3 can let maliciously crafted input consume excessive CPU and crash the affected process. The primary business risk is service or tooling disruption, not disclosed data theft or modification.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or shared services where untrusted input reaches this package. Upgrade promptly during the next expedited maintenance window; isolated developer tooling is lower urgency but should still be updated.

Technical view

Improper input sanitization permits regular-expression denial of service in @eslint/plugin-kit before 0.2.3. Processing malicious input can cause excessive CPU consumption and process failure. The record maps this to CWE-1333 and CWE-770 and assigns CVSS 4.0 score 8.7, driven by high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure exists where version 0.2.2 or earlier is installed directly or transitively and attacker-controlled input can reach the vulnerable processing path. The bundle does not identify specific applications, deployment patterns, or whether typical ESLint usage is remotely reachable.

Exploitation context

The supplied record is not in CISA KEV. Its CVSS vector reports network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and proof-of-concept maturity. This supports credible denial-of-service risk but does not establish active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The sources identify a ReDoS condition and a fixing commit, but the supplied bundle does not describe the precise input grammar, vulnerable call path, affected downstream products, or observed attacks. Validate reachability through dependency and data-flow analysis without stress-testing production systems.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade @eslint/plugin-kit to version 0.2.3 or later.
  • Update dependency lockfiles so vulnerable transitive versions are no longer resolved.
  • Restrict untrusted input from reaching affected processing until upgrades are complete.
  • Check upstream ESLint guidance before applying additional mitigations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory direct and transitive installations of @eslint/plugin-kit.
  • Confirm production and build environments resolve version 0.2.3 or later.
  • Review input paths to determine whether untrusted data reaches the package.
  • Monitor affected processes for unusual CPU spikes, hangs, or crashes.
  • Verify dependency scans no longer report CVE-2024-21539.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1333: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-21539 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:Psnyk
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:P3.93.6snyk

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2024-21539Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/a@eslint/plugin-kit0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1333 · source CWE mapping

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-770 · source CWE mapping

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.