LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-14045: OpenBoxes Product Supplier Edit Controller RoleInterceptor.groovy improper authorization

A weakness has been identified in OpenBoxes up to 0.9.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file grails-app/controllers/org/pih/warehouse/RoleInterceptor.groovy of the component Product Supplier Edit Controller. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 0.9.3 is able to resolve this issue. This patch is called f767ac1a5987d4865d9f158c6a967680f8e45468. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenBoxes 0.9.2 and earlier may let an authenticated remote user perform Product Supplier editing actions without the required authorization. Successful abuse could expose, alter, or disrupt some application data or operations. Version 0.9.3 contains the identified correction.

Executive priority

Schedule prompt remediation, prioritizing remotely accessible deployments and environments with broadly issued user accounts. This is not evidenced as an emergency active-exploitation event, but public exploit material and potential data or operational impact justify timely action.

Technical view

The flaw is an improper authorization condition in grails-app/controllers/org/pih/warehouse/RoleInterceptor.groovy affecting the Product Supplier Edit Controller. The supplied CVSS v2 vector indicates network access, low complexity, single authentication, and partial confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Commit f767ac1a5987d4865d9f158c6a967680f8e45468 is identified as the fix.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is limited to OpenBoxes 0.9.2 or earlier where authenticated users can remotely reach the affected Product Supplier editing functionality. The sources do not establish internet exposure, required user role, or whether default configurations are vulnerable.

Exploitation context

Public proof-of-concept material reportedly exists, increasing practical abuse risk. However, the bundle marks this CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Authentication is required according to the supplied CVSS v2 vector.

Researcher notes

CWE-266 and CWE-285 characterize privilege or authorization failures. The supplied affected list includes 0.9.3, while the description, patch, and release references identify 0.9.3 as fixed. Treat that entry as a source inconsistency and verify the installed commit rather than relying only on version metadata.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected OpenBoxes deployments to version 0.9.3 or later.
  • Confirm the deployed build includes commit f767ac1a5987d4865d9f158c6a967680f8e45468.
  • Restrict affected editing functionality to authorized users until upgrading.
  • Review vendor release and patch guidance before applying compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenBoxes versions and identify deployments running 0.9.2 or earlier.
  • Verify the installed release or source contains the cited authorization patch.
  • Test that unauthorized authenticated roles cannot access Product Supplier editing actions.
  • Review application logs for unexpected Product Supplier changes or denied authorization events.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-266: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-285: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-14045 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
10Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C86.4VulDB
6.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C2.83.4VulDB
6.3CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C2.83.4VulDB
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:PVulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2024-14045Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aOpenBoxes0.9.0, 0.9.1, 0.9.2, 0.9.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-266 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Privilege Assignment

Incorrect Privilege Assignment represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-285 · source CWE mapping

Improper Authorization

Improper Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.