LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-13905: OneStore Sites <= 0.1.1 - Unauthenticated Blind Server-Side Request Forgery

The OneStore Sites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.1 via the class-export.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-13905 affects the OneStore Sites WordPress plugin through version 0.1.1. An unauthenticated internet user may cause the website server to make outbound requests to chosen locations. Business risk depends on whether the site can reach sensitive internal services from its hosting environment.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority internet-facing WordPress issue. Prioritize sites in sensitive hosting environments or networks with internal services reachable from the web tier.

Technical view

The issue is unauthenticated blind SSRF in OneStore Sites via class-export.php. CVSS 3.1 is 5.3, network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction required. The CVE maps to CWE-918 and reports low confidentiality impact, with no integrity or availability impact in the vector.

Likely exposure

Public WordPress sites running OneStore Sites versions up to and including 0.1.1 are the known exposure. Risk is higher where the web server has network access to internal services, metadata endpoints, or administrative interfaces.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerability is unauthenticated and network reachable, but described as blind, meaning attacker feedback may be limited.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies SSRF in class-export.php and affected versions through 0.1.1. The bundle does not name a fixed release, patch commit, exploit activity, or official mitigation. CVSS lists confidentiality impact only, despite the description mentioning possible internal query and modification.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for OneStore Sites versions up to 0.1.1.
  • Check vendor and WordPress plugin guidance for a fixed version or official remediation.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not business-critical.
  • Restrict server outbound access to internal-only services where feasible.
  • Review hosting controls that block access to metadata or private network endpoints.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether OneStore Sites is installed on each WordPress instance.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it to the affected range.
  • Verify whether affected sites are publicly reachable.
  • Review web and outbound proxy logs for unusual server-originated requests.
  • Confirm remediation status against vendor or WordPress plugin guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-13905 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-13905Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
sainwpOneStore Sites0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.