LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-12243: Gnutls: gnutls impacted by inefficient der decoding in libtasn1 leading to remote dos

A flaw was found in GnuTLS, which relies on libtasn1 for ASN.1 data processing. Due to an inefficient algorithm in libtasn1, decoding certain DER-encoded certificate data can take excessive time, leading to increased resource consumption. This flaw allows a remote attacker to send a specially crafted certificate, causing GnuTLS to become unresponsive or slow, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-12243 is a denial-of-service issue in GnuTLS through its libtasn1 certificate parsing. An attacker can send a specially crafted certificate that makes parsing take excessive CPU time, slowing or hanging affected services. The issue affects availability, not data theft or privilege escalation based on the supplied sources.

Executive priority

Treat as a scheduled but visible remediation item. It is remotely reachable and unauthenticated, but the documented impact is denial of service with low availability severity. Prioritize exposed Linux services and vendor appliances before internal-only workloads.

Technical view

GnuTLS relies on libtasn1 for ASN.1 DER decoding. An inefficient decoding algorithm can consume excessive processing time on crafted certificate data. The CVSS 3.1 vector is network-accessible, low complexity, unauthenticated, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and low availability impact. It is classified as CWE-407.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in systems and products using affected GnuTLS/libtasn1 packages to process untrusted certificates. The bundle identifies affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, 9, 10, OpenShift Container Platform 4 rhcos, and Red Hat Discovery 1.14 entries, with additional public advisories from Debian LTS and other vendors.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The attack path is remote and unauthenticated, but impact is limited to service slowdown or unresponsiveness. Practical risk depends on whether exposed services accept or validate attacker-supplied certificates.

Researcher notes

The affected component boundary is GnuTLS behavior driven by libtasn1 DER parsing. The bundle lacks detailed fixed-version mapping for every downstream product, so validation should rely on vendor advisories rather than inferred version ranges. Do not assume compromise or code execution from these sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply relevant Red Hat security advisories where applicable.
  • Check Debian LTS, GnuTLS, libtasn1, and product vendor guidance for fixed packages.
  • Prioritize internet-facing certificate-processing services first.
  • Monitor affected services for abnormal CPU use or TLS handshake latency.
  • Use standard rate limiting or connection controls where operationally appropriate.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems and containers using GnuTLS or libtasn1.
  • Compare installed package versions against vendor advisories and affected package lists.
  • Identify services that process client-supplied or remote certificates.
  • Confirm patched package versions through approved asset management data.
  • Review vulnerability scanner findings for duplicate RHEL package entries.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
11

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-407: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-12243 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
14Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L3.91.4redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-12243Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
siemens-SADPADP container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorgnutlsgnutls, 0, 3.7.0, 3.8.0, 3.8.9unknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gnutls, 0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.3affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gnutls, 0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.3affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gnutls, 0:3.8.3-6.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gnutls, 0:3.8.3-6.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutionsgnutls, 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Supportgnutls, 0:3.8.3-4.el9_4.2affected
Red HatRed Hat Discovery 1.14discovery/discovery-server-rhel9, sha256:ad1045aa0de937c3a6969ec377f7bfeda9a44ee434a954e8245e9840316ffc1caffected
Red HatRed Hat Discovery 1.14discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9, sha256:c960fa13577db72b52765d6941688f431f61fe38adb717b2d8bb6569e241bc5eaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gnutlsaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6gnutlsunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gnutlsunknown
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4rhcosaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-407 · source CWE mapping

Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity

Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.