LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-12088: Rsync: --safe-links option bypass leads to path traversal

A flaw was found in rsync. When using the `--safe-links` option, the rsync client fails to properly verify if a symbolic link destination sent from the server contains another symbolic link within it. This results in a path traversal vulnerability, which may lead to arbitrary file write outside the desired directory.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-12088 is an rsync path traversal flaw affecting clients using the --safe-links option. A malicious or compromised rsync server could cause files to be written outside the intended destination directory. Business urgency is moderate unless your environment pulls data from untrusted or externally controlled rsync servers.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted integrity risk, not a broad emergency. Prioritize patching and workflow review where rsync pulls data from outside your administrative control, especially backup, deployment, and automation systems. Lower urgency applies to environments that do not use rsync clients with --safe-links or only sync from trusted internal servers.

Technical view

The rsync client does not fully validate symbolic-link destinations when --safe-links is used, specifically when the destination path contains another symlink. This can bypass intended link safety checks and allow arbitrary file write outside the transfer directory. CVSS is 6.5, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, and high integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems running affected rsync packages that pull from untrusted, semi-trusted, or compromised rsync servers with --safe-links enabled. Red Hat lists affected RHEL 8, 9, 10, OpenShift Container Platform 4 rhcos, and Red Hat Discovery 1.14 components; RHEL 6 and 7 status is unknown in the provided data.

Exploitation context

The attacker needs control of, or influence over, the rsync server content. A client must initiate a transfer using --safe-links. No CISA KEV listing is provided, so active exploitation should not be assumed. A public Google Security Research advisory is referenced, indicating public technical analysis exists.

Researcher notes

This is CWE-22 path traversal through incomplete symlink validation in rsync client behavior. The provided data supports arbitrary file write outside the desired directory, not code execution by itself. Affected-version detail is strongest for Red Hat products; broader upstream and vendor fix details should be confirmed from each advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply vendor updates from Red Hat, Debian, NetApp, or your platform maintainer where applicable.
  • Prioritize clients that sync from internet-facing, third-party, or lower-trust rsync servers.
  • Avoid using --safe-links with untrusted rsync servers until vendor guidance is applied.
  • Review rsync automation for destination paths that contain or depend on symlinks.
  • If no update is available, follow vendor-specific hardening or workaround guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory rsync versions and packages across Linux servers, appliances, containers, and base images.
  • Search scripts, cron jobs, CI jobs, and backup workflows for --safe-links usage.
  • Identify rsync clients pulling from external or administratively separate servers.
  • Confirm applicable vendor advisories are installed or documented as not applicable.
  • Check Red Hat package status for listed affected RHEL, OpenShift, and Discovery components.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-12088 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
12Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.83.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-12088Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorrsyncrsync, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10rsync, 0:3.4.1-2.el10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8rsync, 0:3.1.3-21.el8_10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9rsync, 0:3.2.5-3.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9rsync, 0:3.2.5-3.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Discovery 1.14discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9, 1.14.2-1748467619affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6rsyncunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7rsyncunknown
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4rhcosaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-22 · source CWE mapping

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.