CVE-2024-1132: Keycloak: path transversal in redirection validation
A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-1132 is a Keycloak redirect validation flaw. If a client allows wildcard redirect URIs, an attacker may lure a user into a malicious link that bypasses validation and reaches other same-domain URLs or sensitive information. This matters because identity systems sit in front of many business applications.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation where Keycloak protects sensitive applications or broad SSO access. The flaw is high severity and identity-adjacent, but the available sources do not show confirmed active exploitation.
Technical view
The issue is classified as CWE-22 path traversal in redirect URL validation. CVSS is 8.1 high: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, with high confidentiality and integrity impact. The source bundle lists affected Keycloak 21.1.0 and 23.0.0 plus several Red Hat products and packages containing Keycloak components.
Likely exposure
Most likely exposure is Keycloak, Red Hat build of Keycloak, or RHSSO deployments where clients use wildcard entries in Valid Redirect URIs. Red Hat also lists affected bundled products, including Migration Toolkit, Apicurio Registry 2, and Red Hat build of Quarkus packages.
Exploitation context
The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction with a malicious URL and depends on vulnerable redirect validation plus wildcard redirect URI configuration.
Researcher notes
Focus validation on client redirect configuration, not only server version. The affected condition specifically mentions wildcard Valid Redirect URIs and user interaction. Source evidence is vendor-centered; exploit prevalence and exact fixed upstream versions are not fully established in the bundle.
Mitigation direction
Review Red Hat errata for applicable fixed packages and update affected products.
Replace wildcard Valid Redirect URIs with exact, least-privilege redirect URLs.
Audit Keycloak clients for broad redirect patterns and unnecessary domain wildcards.
Check vendor guidance before applying compensating controls not named in advisories.
Validation and detection
Inventory Keycloak, RHSSO, and Red Hat products listed in the affected matrix.
Identify clients using wildcard values in the Valid Redirect URIs field.
Confirm installed package versions against Red Hat CVE and errata records.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup
File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
15Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.