Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Gosoft Software Proticaret E-Commerce before v6.0 has a CSRF issue that could let an attacker trick a user into causing unintended actions. The CVSS score is high at 8.8. The source notes the fix process is still ongoing for v4.05, so legacy deployments need special attention.
Executive priority
Treat this as high priority for any business using Proticaret E-Commerce before v6.0. The risk is significant because successful CSRF can affect sensitive actions, but evidence of active exploitation is not supplied.
Technical view
The CVE describes CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery in Proticaret E-Commerce before v6.0. The vector is network reachable, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and user interaction required. Rated impacts are high for confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No KEV listing is provided.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely for organizations running Gosoft Software Proticaret E-Commerce before v6.0, including v4.05. Confirm exact deployed versions and whether administrative or sensitive workflows are reachable from user browsers.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV is false. The attack model requires user interaction, consistent with CSRF. No exploit details or public weaponization evidence are provided in the supplied sources.
Researcher notes
Version data is somewhat terse: the description says before v6.0, while affected entries include 0 and v4.05 with defaultStatus unaffected. Use the CVE description and government advisory as anchors, then verify product branch details with the vendor.
Mitigation direction
- Check vendor and government advisory pages for current remediation guidance.
- Upgrade to v6.0 or later if vendor guidance confirms it resolves exposure.
- For v4.05, track vendor fix status because the source says remediation is ongoing.
- Restrict access to sensitive Proticaret administrative workflows where feasible.
- Review session and CSRF protections with the vendor or maintainer.
Validation and detection
- Inventory all Proticaret E-Commerce deployments and record exact versions.
- Flag any deployment earlier than v6.0 for urgent review.
- Confirm whether v4.05 systems have a vendor-supported fix path.
- Review logs for unusual sensitive actions around user sessions.
- Verify mitigations against vendor guidance, not assumptions.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2024-11142 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 8.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9TR-CERTVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
8.8HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.usom.gov.tr/bildirim/tr-25-0098CVE reference, TR-CERT · government-resource, broken-link
- https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-25-0098CVE reference, TR-CERT · government-resource
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.