CVE-2024-10035: Code Injection in BG-TEK's CoslatV3
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection'), Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in BG-TEK Informatics Security Technologies CoslatV3 allows Command Injection, Privilege Escalation.
This issue affects CoslatV3: through 3.1069.
NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2024-10035 is a critical command/code injection issue in BG-TEK CoslatV3 through version 3.1069. A low-privileged local user could potentially run unintended commands and escalate privileges. The vendor reportedly said the product is unsupported, so replacement planning is likely more important than waiting for a normal patch cycle.
Executive priority
Prioritize identification and decommissioning planning for any CoslatV3 deployment. The issue is critical, the product is reportedly unsupported, and normal patch expectations may not apply. Do not assume internet exposure is required for business impact.
Technical view
The CVE maps to CWE-77, CWE-78, and CWE-94: unsafe command or code generation and OS command handling. CVSS 4.0 score is 9.2 with local attack vector, low attack complexity, low privileges required, and no user interaction. Reported impacts include high confidentiality, integrity, availability, and privilege escalation consequences.
Likely exposure
Organizations running BG-TEK CoslatV3 through 3.1069 are exposed. No CPEs were supplied, so vulnerability management teams may need product inventory, host review, and direct version checks rather than relying only on scanner matches.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. Risk is highest where low-privileged local users, service accounts, or attackers with existing host access can interact with affected CoslatV3 installations.
Researcher notes
The public record provides vulnerability classes, affected product/version range, CVSS, and unsupported-product note, but does not provide a patch, detailed root cause, proof of exploitation, or CPE data. Validation should stay focused on asset discovery and defensive evidence review.
Mitigation direction
Confirm whether any CoslatV3 deployment remains in production.
Treat CoslatV3 through 3.1069 as affected.
Check vendor or government advisories for any later guidance.
Because the product is unsupported, plan removal or replacement.
Restrict local access to affected CoslatV3 hosts.
Monitor affected hosts for unexpected privilege or process changes.
Validation and detection
Inventory systems for BG-TEK CoslatV3 installations.
Record installed CoslatV3 versions and compare against 3.1069.
Review local users and service accounts on affected hosts.
Check EDR and system logs for unusual execution activity.
Confirm whether compensating access controls are enforced.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.