LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2024-0590: Microsoft Clarity <= 0.9.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting

The Microsoft Clarity plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the edit_clarity_project_id() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the project id and add malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2024-0590 affects the Microsoft Clarity WordPress plugin through version 0.9.3. A site administrator who is tricked into taking an action could unknowingly let an attacker change the Clarity project ID and store malicious JavaScript. This is not listed as actively exploited in the supplied sources.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate web-risk item. Prioritize externally facing WordPress properties using Microsoft Clarity, especially sites with many administrators or weak admin security practices. The business risk is stored script execution on public pages after administrator social engineering.

Technical view

The issue is CSRF caused by missing nonce validation in edit_clarity_project_id(). The reported impact is stored cross-site scripting through a forged request that requires administrator interaction. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1, with network access, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running Microsoft Clarity plugin versions up to and including 0.9.3. Sites without this plugin, or not on affected versions, are not indicated as exposed by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The attacker must trick a WordPress administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link. The supplied bundle does not include KEV listing, confirmed exploitation, public exploit details, or broader campaign evidence.

Researcher notes

The source bundle identifies CWE-352 and a CSRF-to-stored-XSS path, but does not provide complete patch metadata beyond the WordPress Trac reference. Avoid assuming active exploitation or exact fixed version unless confirmed from vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites using the Microsoft Clarity plugin.
  • Check whether installed versions are 0.9.3 or earlier.
  • Review Microsoft or WordPress plugin guidance for the fixed release.
  • Update or disable the plugin according to vendor guidance.
  • Limit WordPress administrator access to trusted users.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm plugin presence and version on each WordPress site.
  • Review plugin settings for unexpected Clarity project ID changes.
  • Check pages for unexpected JavaScript introduced through Clarity configuration.
  • Verify the vulnerable function is protected by nonce validation after update.
  • Review administrator activity around suspicious setting changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2024-0590 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2024-0590Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
microsoftMicrosoft Clarity0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.