LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-6246: Glibc: heap-based buffer overflow in __vsyslog_internal()

A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

HighCVSS 8.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-6246 is a glibc bug in syslog handling that can overflow heap memory. A local attacker may be able to crash an application or gain higher privileges if vulnerable conditions are present. Because glibc is a core Linux library, exposure depends heavily on distribution package status and vendor backports.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation in standard Linux patch cycles, faster for multi-user servers, shared build hosts, and systems with untrusted local users. Do not treat it as internet-exposed by default, but do treat unpatched affected systems as potential privilege-escalation risk.

Technical view

The flaw is a heap-based buffer overflow in glibc __vsyslog_internal(), reachable through syslog() and vsyslog(). Sources describe impact when openlog() was not called, or ident is NULL, and argv[0] basename exceeds 1024 bytes. The bundle states glibc 2.36 and newer are affected, with Fedora affected and listed RHEL versions marked unaffected.

Likely exposure

Most relevant exposure is Linux systems using vulnerable glibc builds, especially distributions shipping glibc 2.36 or newer without the vendor fix. The provided bundle explicitly flags Fedora glibc as affected and listed Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 9 glibc packages as unaffected.

Exploitation context

This is a local vulnerability, not a remote network entry point. Public technical advisories and write-ups exist, but the bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Treat it as serious because successful exploitation could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Researcher notes

The important constraints are local access, glibc version, vendor backport status, and application behavior around openlog ident handling. The source bundle contains enough detail for exposure triage but not a universal fixed-version matrix across all Linux distributions.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Linux systems and record glibc package versions from trusted package metadata.
  • Apply distribution-provided glibc security updates where the vendor marks systems affected.
  • Prioritize Fedora and any systems running glibc 2.36 or newer pending vendor confirmation.
  • Check appliance and embedded vendor advisories for bundled glibc exposure.
  • Restart affected services after glibc updates according to vendor guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each system’s glibc build against the distribution security advisory.
  • Verify whether the vendor marks the installed package affected, fixed, or unaffected.
  • Identify privileged local programs that use syslog or vsyslog for risk assessment.
  • Review EDR and crash telemetry for unusual local crashes in syslog-using programs.
  • Track vendor advisories for NetApp, Siemens, Gentoo, Fedora, and Red Hat environments.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
11

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-6246 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
10Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.55.9redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.4High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-6246Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aglibc2.39Listed
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6compat-glibcunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6glibcunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7compat-glibcunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7glibcunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8glibcunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9glibcunaffected
FedoraFedoraglibcaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.