LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-5933: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in GitLab

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions after 13.7 before 16.6.6, 16.7 prior to 16.7.4, and 16.8 prior to 16.8.1. Improper input sanitization of user name allows arbitrary API PUT requests.

MediumCVSS 6.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

GitLab reported a medium-severity flaw where improperly sanitized user names could be abused, with user interaction, to trigger arbitrary API PUT requests. The main business risk is unauthorized changes through a trusted GitLab instance, affecting confidentiality and integrity rather than availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as a timely security patch, not an emergency absent exploitation evidence. Patch within the next scheduled security window, faster for exposed or user-dense GitLab deployments.

Technical view

CVE-2023-5933 is a CWE-80 basic XSS/input sanitization issue in GitLab CE/EE. It affects versions after 13.7 before 16.6.6, 16.7 before 16.7.4, and 16.8 before 16.8.1. CVSS 3.1 is 6.4 with network access, low privileges, high attack complexity, and required user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to self-managed GitLab CE/EE instances running the affected version ranges. Risk increases where untrusted or many low-privileged users can set profile names and interact with other users inside GitLab.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV, and the provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation. Public references include a GitLab issue and HackerOne report, but both are marked permissions-required, so technical evidence is incomplete.

Researcher notes

The description links an XSS-style sanitization weakness in user names to arbitrary API PUT requests. Avoid assuming broader RCE or availability impact; the CVSS vector indicates confidentiality and integrity impact, required interaction, and authenticated prerequisites.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected GitLab instances to 16.6.6, 16.7.4, 16.8.1, or later supported versions.
  • Prioritize internet-facing and multi-tenant GitLab instances first.
  • Check GitLab’s security release guidance for any environment-specific instructions.
  • Review whether low-privileged users can register or modify names freely.
  • Monitor GitLab audit logs for unexpected API PUT-driven changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all GitLab CE/EE versions against the affected ranges.
  • Confirm each instance reports a fixed or later supported version.
  • Review user and audit activity around unexpected profile or API-driven changes.
  • Validate upgrade completion in staging before production rollout where practical.
  • Document remaining exceptions and compensating controls for vulnerable instances.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-80: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-5933 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N1.25.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-5933Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
GitLabGitLab13.7, 16.7, 16.8unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-80 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)

Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.