LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-5574: Xorg-x11-server: use-after-free bug in damagedestroy

A use-after-free flaw was found in xorg-x11-server-Xvfb. This issue occurs in Xvfb with a very specific and legacy configuration (a multi-screen setup with multiple protocol screens, also known as Zaphod mode). If the pointer is warped from a screen 1 to a screen 0, a use-after-free issue may be triggered during shutdown or reset of the Xvfb server, allowing for possible escalation of privileges or denial of service.

HighCVSS 7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-5574 is a memory safety bug in Xorg Xvfb under a narrow legacy multi-screen configuration. A local user could potentially crash the service or gain higher privileges. Business urgency is highest for Linux systems where untrusted users can start or interact with Xvfb or VNC-related graphical sessions.

Executive priority

Handle through normal high-severity Linux patch governance, with faster action on shared servers, VDI, CI, or lab systems where untrusted users can run Xvfb. The issue is serious but constrained by local access and a specific legacy configuration.

Technical view

The flaw is a CWE-416 use-after-free in damagedestroy affecting xorg-x11-server-Xvfb. It is triggered in Zaphod-style multi-screen setups when pointer movement between screens precedes Xvfb shutdown or reset. Red Hat rates related impact high with CVSS 7.0: local access, high complexity, low privileges, no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears narrow. Red Hat lists xorg-x11-server as affected on RHEL 7, 8, and 9, and tigervnc 0:1.13.1-8.el9 as affected on RHEL 9. Xwayland is listed unaffected on RHEL 8 and 9. Risk depends on Xvfb use with legacy multi-screen protocol screens.

Exploitation context

Sources describe a local, high-complexity condition requiring a specific legacy Xvfb multi-screen configuration and server shutdown or reset. The source bundle does not indicate CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Treat internet-facing exposure as indirect unless remote users can obtain local graphical session access.

Researcher notes

Do not assume all Xorg deployments are exploitable. The described trigger is Xvfb-specific and configuration-dependent. Red Hat affectedness differs by package and release, with several unaffected entries. Evidence provided does not include public exploitation or a universal upstream mitigation beyond vendor advisories.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply applicable vendor updates, including Red Hat guidance in RHSA-2024:2298 where relevant.
  • Review Red Hat CVE guidance for affected package and platform status.
  • Disable or avoid legacy Xvfb multi-screen Zaphod configurations where not required.
  • Prioritize systems allowing untrusted local users to run graphical or VNC sessions.
  • Check NetApp advisory applicability if NetApp products are in scope.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory RHEL systems for xorg-x11-server, Xvfb, and tigervnc packages.
  • Identify Xvfb deployments using legacy multi-screen protocol-screen configurations.
  • Verify applicable Red Hat errata or package updates are installed.
  • Confirm Xwayland-only systems are not incorrectly treated as affected.
  • For RHEL 6 xorg status, seek vendor confirmation before closing risk.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-416: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-5574 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H15.9redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-5574Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9tigervnc, 0:1.13.1-8.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6tigervncunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6xorg-x11-serverunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7tigervncunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7xorg-x11-serveraffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8tigervncunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8xorg-x11-serveraffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8xorg-x11-server-Xwaylandunaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9xorg-x11-serveraffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9xorg-x11-server-Xwaylandunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-416 · source CWE mapping

Use After Free

Use After Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.