LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-54232: m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table __get_kernel_nofault() does copy data in supervisor mode when forcing a task backtrace log through /proc/sysrq_trigger. This is expected cause a bus error exception on e.g. NULL pointer dereferencing when logging a kernel task has no workqueue associated. This bus error ought to be ignored. Our 030 bus error handler is ill equipped to deal with this: Whenever ssw indicates a kernel mode access on a data fault, we don't even attempt to handle the fault and instead always send a SEGV signal (or panic). As a result, the check for exception handling at the fault PC (buried in send_sig_fault() which gets called from do_page_fault() eventually) is never used. In contrast, both 040 and 060 access error handlers do not care whether a fault happened on supervisor mode access, and will call do_page_fault() on those, ultimately honoring the exception table. Add a check in bus_error030 to call do_page_fault() in case we do have an entry for the fault PC in our exception table. I had attempted a fix for this earlier in 2019 that did rely on testing pagefault_disabled() (see link below) to achieve the same thing, but this patch should be more generic. Tested on 030 Atari Falcon.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a Linux kernel flaw affecting the m68k architecture, specifically 68030 bus error handling. Under certain kernel backtrace logging conditions, an expected fault may be mishandled and can result in a process signal or kernel panic. Business exposure is likely narrow because m68k systems are uncommon in modern enterprise fleets.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted availability issue, not a broad enterprise emergency. Escalate if the organization operates legacy m68k Linux systems, embedded environments, or m68k test infrastructure. Otherwise, track through normal kernel maintenance.

Technical view

The 030 bus error handler skipped normal page fault handling for supervisor-mode data faults, so exception-table recovery was not honored. The fix makes bus_error030 call do_page_fault() when the fault PC has an exception-table entry. The source notes this was tested on an 030 Atari Falcon.

Likely exposure

Likely limited to Linux systems running on m68k, especially 68030-class hardware or emulation. The provided record lists Linux versions as affected but does not provide a CVSS score or broad product-specific impact details.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is indicated in the provided sources, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The described trigger involves kernel task backtrace logging through /proc/sysrq_trigger, but the sources do not establish practical attacker prerequisites or exploitability.

Researcher notes

The public record lacks CVSS, CWE, and detailed attack prerequisites. Impact appears architecture-specific and tied to exception-table handling during supervisor-mode faults. The stable commit references are the main remediation evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify whether any Linux m68k systems exist in the environment.
  • Prioritize 68030-class m68k systems or emulators for review.
  • Update to a kernel version containing the referenced stable fixes.
  • If using a vendor kernel, check vendor advisories for backported fixes.
  • Restrict administrative access to sysrq-related kernel debugging interfaces.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux systems by architecture and kernel version.
  • Confirm whether m68k kernels are deployed or built internally.
  • Check kernel changelogs for the referenced m68k bus_error030 fix.
  • Verify vendor kernel packages include the relevant stable commit.
  • Review crash logs for unexplained m68k kernel panics during backtrace logging.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-54232 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
9Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxf2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84, f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84, f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84, f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84, f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84, f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84, f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84, f2325ecebc5b7988fd49968bd3a660fd1594dc84unaffected
LinuxLinux2.6.18, 0, 4.14.312, 4.19.280, 5.4.240, 5.10.177, 5.15.105, 6.1.22, 6.2.9, 6.3affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.