CVE-2023-53585: bpf: reject unhashed sockets in bpf_sk_assign
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: reject unhashed sockets in bpf_sk_assign
The semantics for bpf_sk_assign are as follows:
sk = some_lookup_func()
bpf_sk_assign(skb, sk)
bpf_sk_release(sk)
That is, the sk is not consumed by bpf_sk_assign. The function
therefore needs to make sure that sk lives long enough to be
consumed from __inet_lookup_skb. The path through the stack for a
TCPv4 packet is roughly:
netif_receive_skb_core: takes RCU read lock
__netif_receive_skb_core:
sch_handle_ingress:
tcf_classify:
bpf_sk_assign()
deliver_ptype_list_skb:
deliver_skb:
ip_packet_type->func == ip_rcv:
ip_rcv_core:
ip_rcv_finish_core:
dst_input:
ip_local_deliver:
ip_local_deliver_finish:
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu:
tcp_v4_rcv:
__inet_lookup_skb:
skb_steal_sock
The existing helper takes advantage of the fact that everything
happens in the same RCU critical section: for sockets with
SOCK_RCU_FREE set bpf_sk_assign never takes a reference.
skb_steal_sock then checks SOCK_RCU_FREE again and does sock_put
if necessary.
This approach assumes that SOCK_RCU_FREE is never set on a sk
between bpf_sk_assign and skb_steal_sock, but this invariant is
violated by unhashed UDP sockets. A new UDP socket is created
in TCP_CLOSE state but without SOCK_RCU_FREE set. That flag is only
added in udp_lib_get_port() which happens when a socket is bound.
When bpf_sk_assign was added it wasn't possible to access unhashed
UDP sockets from BPF, so this wasn't a problem. This changed
in commit 0c48eefae712 ("sock_map: Lift socket state restriction
for datagram sockets"), but the helper wasn't adjusted accordingly.
The following sequence of events will therefore lead to a refcount
leak:
1. Add socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM) to a sockmap.
2. Pull socket out of sockmap and bpf_sk_assign it. Since
SOCK_RCU_FREE is not set we increment the refcount.
3. bind() or connect() the socket, setting SOCK_RCU_FREE.
4. skb_steal_sock will now set refcounted = false due to
SOCK_RCU_FREE.
5. tcp_v4_rcv() skips sock_put().
Fix the problem by rejecting unhashed sockets in bpf_sk_assign().
This matches the behaviour of __inet_lookup_skb which is ultimately
the goal of bpf_sk_assign().
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2023-53585 is a Linux kernel bug in BPF socket assignment handling. A specific UDP socket state can cause a socket reference count leak. The public record shows the kernel fix rejects unhashed sockets in this path. No active exploitation is indicated by KEV or the provided sources.
Executive priority
Treat as a planned kernel maintenance item unless your environment heavily uses BPF networking. There is no cited active exploitation or CVSS score, but kernel resource leaks can affect reliability. Patch through normal Linux update channels after vendor confirmation.
Technical view
The issue is in bpf_sk_assign(). It assumed SOCK_RCU_FREE would not change before skb_steal_sock. Unhashed UDP sockets can be added to sockmap, assigned, then bound or connected, changing SOCK_RCU_FREE and causing tcp_v4_rcv() to skip sock_put(), leaking a reference. Stable fixes reject unhashed sockets.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to Linux systems running affected kernel versions or downstream builds containing the vulnerable BPF behavior. The source lists Linux 5.7 through fixed stable releases, including 5.10.195, 5.15.132, 6.1.53, 6.4.16, 6.5.3, and 6.6 as affected markers.
Exploitation context
The provided sources describe a required sequence involving UDP sockets, sockmap, BPF socket lookup/assignment, and later bind or connect behavior. They do not state public exploitation, weaponized code, remote reachability, or required privileges. KEV status is false.
Researcher notes
The record identifies a refcount leak caused by changing SOCK_RCU_FREE state for unhashed UDP sockets after bpf_sk_assign. The fix aligns bpf_sk_assign behavior with __inet_lookup_skb by rejecting unhashed sockets. Public impact details beyond the leak are limited in the provided sources.
Mitigation direction
Update to a kernel build containing the referenced stable fixes.
Check your Linux distribution advisory for the corrected package version.
Prioritize systems that use BPF networking, sockmap, or custom traffic classification.
If patching is delayed, consult vendor guidance for supported risk-reduction options.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions across servers, appliances, and container hosts.
Compare installed kernels with vendor advisories and the referenced stable commits.
Confirm the bpf_sk_assign fix is present in deployed kernel source or changelog.
Review environments for BPF sockmap or traffic-control BPF usage.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2023-53585 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
Oct 4, 2025, 15:44 UTC (UTC+00:00)
CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.