LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-53396: ubifs: Fix memory leak in do_rename

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ubifs: Fix memory leak in do_rename If renaming a file in an encrypted directory, function fscrypt_setup_filename allocates memory for a file name. This name is never used, and before returning to the caller the memory for it is not freed. When running kmemleak on it we see that it is registered as a leak. The report below is triggered by a simple program 'rename' that renames a file in an encrypted directory: unreferenced object 0xffff888101502840 (size 32): comm "rename", pid 9404, jiffies 4302582475 (age 435.735s) backtrace: __kmem_cache_alloc_node __kmalloc fscrypt_setup_filename do_rename ubifs_rename vfs_rename do_renameat2 To fix this we can remove the call to fscrypt_setup_filename as it's not needed.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-53396 is a Linux kernel UBIFS memory leak during file rename operations inside encrypted directories. A local, low-privileged user is required. The main business risk is availability degradation on affected Linux systems, not data theft or data modification.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate operational risk. It is not currently evidenced as exploited in the wild, but affected systems with local user access could suffer availability impact. Prioritize embedded or specialized Linux environments using UBIFS encryption.

Technical view

The UBIFS do_rename path calls fscrypt_setup_filename for encrypted directories, allocating filename memory that is not freed. The kernel fix removes the unnecessary call. The CVSS vector is local, low complexity, low privilege, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux systems using UBIFS with encrypted directories. Kernel version and distribution backport status must be checked because the source bundle lists commit and version data rather than a simple product advisory.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Evidence supports a local denial-of-service style availability risk through memory leakage, but it does not support remote exploitation, confidentiality impact, or integrity impact.

Researcher notes

The key condition is UBIFS rename handling in encrypted directories. The source states fscrypt_setup_filename allocates memory that is not freed and the fix removes the unnecessary call. Affected version interpretation should rely on upstream commits and distributor backports.

Mitigation direction

  • Update affected Linux kernels using distribution or kernel stable guidance.
  • Prioritize systems using UBIFS with encrypted directories.
  • Apply vendor-provided backports when full kernel upgrade is not practical.
  • Monitor affected hosts for abnormal kernel memory growth.
  • Track the referenced stable kernel commits in change management.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux systems using UBIFS and encrypted directories.
  • Compare running kernels against vendor advisories and referenced stable commits.
  • Confirm whether distribution kernels include the UBIFS do_rename fix.
  • Review system monitoring for unexplained memory pressure on exposed hosts.
  • Validate fixes first on representative non-production systems.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-401: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-53396 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.83.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-53396Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxc67bc98d1f0853bb196e9c48eab38b6f2ddab795, 278d9a243635f26c05ad95dcf9c5a593b9e04dc6, 278d9a243635f26c05ad95dcf9c5a593b9e04dc6, 278d9a243635f26c05ad95dcf9c5a593b9e04dc6, 278d9a243635f26c05ad95dcf9c5a593b9e04dc6, 17495eb2f7f08113b50aba298c2c1a045824c4f7, 868de33a39e0e1e91ed3ce4a23a65f30144d2443, 5.15.33, 5.16.19, 5.17.2unaffected
LinuxLinux5.18, 0, 5.15.112, 6.1.28, 6.2.15, 6.3.2, 6.4affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-401 · source CWE mapping

Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.