LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-52355: Libtiff: tiffrasterscanlinesize64 produce too-big size and could cause oom

An out-of-memory flaw was found in libtiff that could be triggered by passing a crafted tiff file to the TIFFRasterScanlineSize64() API. This flaw allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted input with a size smaller than 379 KB.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-52355 is a denial-of-service flaw in libtiff. A specially crafted TIFF file, reportedly under 379 KB, can cause excessive memory use when processed through TIFFRasterScanlineSize64(). Business impact is service disruption where systems automatically ingest or process TIFF images.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or automated image-processing systems. This is not described as data theft or code execution, but it can disrupt services with small crafted files.

Technical view

The flaw affects libtiff’s TIFFRasterScanlineSize64() API, which can calculate an excessively large size and trigger out-of-memory conditions. Red Hat lists affected libtiff packages across RHEL 8, RHEL 9, RHEL 10, and some Red Hat AI Inference Server and Discovery container packages. CVSS is 7.5, network attack vector, availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure is in servers, applications, containers, or workflows that accept TIFF files from users, partners, email, web uploads, scanners, or automated image pipelines.

Exploitation context

The public sources describe crafted-file denial of service. The provided data does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. No exploit code or operational attack details are provided here.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for Red Hat-packaged libtiff and referenced Red Hat product containers. The bundle does not provide fixed versions or detailed upstream patch metadata. Treat non-Red Hat exposure as possible where libtiff uses the affected API, pending vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply applicable Red Hat security advisories for affected products and packages.
  • Update libtiff or dependent container images through vendor-supported channels.
  • Inventory applications that process TIFF files automatically or from untrusted sources.
  • Limit untrusted TIFF ingestion where updates cannot be applied promptly.
  • Check upstream libtiff issue and vendor guidance for non-Red Hat environments.

Validation and detection

  • Identify installed libtiff and compat-libtiff3 package versions across Linux assets.
  • Check Red Hat advisories for product-specific affected and fixed package guidance.
  • Review container base images for bundled libtiff packages.
  • Confirm TIFF-processing services remain stable after vendor updates.
  • Monitor memory-exhaustion alerts in image-processing workflows.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
12

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-52355 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
11Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-52355Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibtifflibtiff, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libtiff, 0:4.4.0-15.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9, 3.2.2-1765379088affected
Red HatRed Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9, 3.2.2-1765379049affected
Red HatRed Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9, 3.2.2-1764871796affected
Red HatRed Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9, 1772160593affected
Red HatRed Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9, 1772160625affected
Red HatRed Hat Discovery 2discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9, 2.4.0-1763656152affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libtiffaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libtiffunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7compat-libtiff3unknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libtiffunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8compat-libtiff3affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libtiffaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-787 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Write

Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.