Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A WordPress marketing popup and lead-generation plugin has a CSRF flaw. If a logged-in site user is tricked into interacting with malicious content, limited unauthorized changes may occur. The published CVSS score is 4.3, with integrity impact only.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate WordPress hygiene issue. Prioritize remediation on externally managed production sites, especially where marketing or admin users regularly access WordPress dashboards.
Technical view
CVE-2023-52119 is CWE-352 in Icegram Engage for WordPress through 3.1.18. The CVSS vector indicates network attackability, low complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, unchanged scope, low integrity impact, and no confidentiality or availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running Icegram Engage through version 3.1.18. The source bundle does not identify specific vulnerable actions, roles, or endpoints.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation. CSRF generally depends on a victim user interaction within an authenticated browser session.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse: the bundle confirms product, version range, CWE, CVSS, and Patchstack reference, but not vulnerable endpoint details, fixed version, or proof of exploitation. Avoid assuming broader impact without vendor details.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory WordPress sites for the Icegram Engage plugin and installed version.
- If version is 3.1.18 or older, check vendor or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release.
- Update, disable, or remove the plugin according to vendor-supported remediation guidance.
- Limit administrative sessions and use least-privilege roles until remediation is complete.
Validation and detection
- Confirm the plugin slug or package name is icegram on each WordPress site.
- Record installed Icegram Engage versions and compare against affected versions through 3.1.18.
- Review vendor or Patchstack advisories for remediation status before closing the issue.
- Check change-management records for any unexpected Icegram configuration changes.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2023-52119 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 4.3 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
4.3MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Source materials
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
