Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
MeshCentral 1.1.16 is reported to use a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm. For executives, the main concern is possible exposure of sensitive remote-management data if the vulnerable version is deployed, especially on internet-facing systems.
Executive priority
Prioritize within normal high-severity remediation timelines, faster for internet-facing remote-management systems. Business risk is driven by sensitive administrative access and potential confidentiality exposure.
Technical view
CVE-2023-51838 maps to CWE-327 and carries CVSS 3.1 score 7.5. The vector indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality impact only.
Likely exposure
Likely exposure is limited to organizations running Ylianst MeshCentral 1.1.16. The CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete, so asset confirmation is important before prioritizing remediation.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Treat this as a high-severity cryptographic weakness with plausible confidentiality risk, not as confirmed exploitation.
Researcher notes
The public CVE record is sparse: affected CPEs are not populated, and the bundle does not identify a specific patch. Analysis should stay tied to MeshCentral 1.1.16 and CWE-327 unless vendor evidence expands scope.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory MeshCentral deployments and confirm whether version 1.1.16 is present.
- Check MeshCentral vendor guidance for fixed versions or recommended configuration changes.
- Restrict access to MeshCentral management services to trusted networks where possible.
- Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or privileged remote-management deployments.
Validation and detection
- Confirm installed MeshCentral versions from asset inventory or administrative records.
- Check whether MeshCentral services are exposed to the internet or broad internal networks.
- Review vendor or project guidance for CVE-2023-51838 remediation status.
- Document compensating controls if upgrade guidance is unavailable.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-327: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2023-51838 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.5HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Source materials
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.