Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This issue affects WordPress sites using DAEXT League Table versions through 1.13. It is a CSRF flaw, meaning an attacker may trick a user into making an unintended plugin action. The cited severity is medium, with limited integrity and availability impact.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate WordPress plugin risk. It is not presented as actively exploited, but affected public sites should be identified and remediated through vendor guidance because CSRF can enable unauthorized changes through user interaction.
Technical view
CVE-2023-48334 is CWE-352 in DAEXT League Table through version 1.13. CVSS 3.1 is 5.4: network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, and low integrity and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to WordPress environments where the DAEXT League Table plugin, package league-table-lite, is installed at version 1.13 or earlier.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires user interaction and can cause limited unauthorized state changes or availability impact.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Patchstack reference. No exploit details, fixed version, or specific vulnerable action is included in the provided bundle. Avoid assuming impact beyond CVSS low integrity and availability effects.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory WordPress sites for DAEXT League Table or league-table-lite installations.
- Check installed plugin versions and flag version 1.13 or earlier.
- Review DAEXT or Patchstack guidance for fixed versions or vendor-recommended mitigations.
- Prioritize remediation on externally administered or high-value WordPress sites.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether the plugin is installed on each WordPress instance.
- Record the exact plugin version from WordPress administration or asset inventory.
- Review logs for unexpected plugin configuration or content changes.
- Verify remediation status against vendor or Patchstack advisory information.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2023-48334 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.4 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
5.4MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Source materials
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.