LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-47655: WordPress ANAC XML Bandi di Gara Plugin <= 7.5 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi ANAC XML Bandi di Gara.This issue affects ANAC XML Bandi di Gara: from n/a through 7.5.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a medium-severity CSRF issue in the WordPress ANAC XML Bandi di Gara plugin through version 7.5. If a logged-in user is tricked into interacting with attacker-controlled content, unintended plugin actions may occur. Sources indicate limited integrity and availability impact, with no confidentiality impact.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate WordPress plugin risk. It is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle, but affected public sites should still be remediated in normal patch cycles, faster where the plugin supports operational or public procurement workflows.

Technical view

CVE-2023-47655 is CWE-352 in Marco Milesi ANAC XML Bandi di Gara, package avcp, affecting versions through 7.5. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4: network reachable, low complexity, no attacker privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, low integrity and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the ANAC XML Bandi di Gara plugin, especially versions through 7.5. The bundle provides no CPEs and no detailed configuration prerequisites, so asset inventory should confirm plugin presence and exact version.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cite active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction, consistent with CSRF. Available evidence does not describe exploit maturity, public proof-of-concept availability, or specific vulnerable actions.

Researcher notes

Evidence is thin beyond the CVE metadata and Patchstack entry. Do not assume a specific vulnerable endpoint, required role, or fixed version without vendor confirmation. Focus validation on plugin presence, version through 7.5, and whether official remediation guidance exists.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the ANAC XML Bandi di Gara plugin.
  • Check Patchstack and vendor guidance for a fixed version or official mitigation.
  • Update the plugin when a vendor-confirmed patched release is available.
  • Disable the plugin if no fix exists and business use is not required.
  • Monitor for unexpected plugin-related changes after suspected exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether ANAC XML Bandi di Gara is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it against through-7.5 exposure.
  • Review WordPress admin activity for unexpected plugin-related changes.
  • After remediation, verify the plugin is updated, disabled, or otherwise addressed.
  • Track vendor and Patchstack advisories for clarification on fixed versions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-47655 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-47655Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Marco MilesiANAC XML Bandi di Garaavcp, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.