LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-47552: WordPress Image Hover Effects Plugin <= 5.5 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Labib Ahmed Image Hover Effects – WordPress Plugin.This issue affects Image Hover Effects – WordPress Plugin: from n/a through 5.5.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a medium-risk CSRF issue in the WordPress Image Hover Effects plugin through version 5.5. An attacker would need to trick a user into interacting with a crafted request. The documented impact is limited integrity and availability loss, with no confidentiality impact in the CVSS vector.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate WordPress hygiene issue. Prioritize internet-facing business sites using this plugin, especially where many administrators manage content. The available evidence does not support emergency response language, but unresolved CSRF in WordPress plugins can enable unauthorized changes if users are tricked.

Technical view

CVE-2023-47552 is CWE-352 affecting Labib Ahmed Image Hover Effects WordPress plugin through 5.5. CVSS 3.1 is 5.4: network reachable, low complexity, no attacker privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, low integrity and availability impact. The provided sources do not describe the vulnerable action or fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with the Image Hover Effects plugin, package name image-hover-effects, at version 5.5 or earlier. The bundle does not identify affected configurations, roles, or specific plugin actions.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Practical exploitation would require user interaction consistent with CSRF, but the sources do not provide exploit details or affected workflows.

Researcher notes

Key gaps remain: the bundle does not name the vulnerable endpoint, nonce failure, required victim role, fixed version, or observed exploitation. Keep analysis bounded to plugin version exposure and vendor/Patchstack updates unless additional primary evidence becomes available.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the image-hover-effects plugin and installed version.
  • Check vendor, WordPress plugin, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version.
  • Update if an official fixed release is identified by vendor guidance.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where unnecessary until remediation is confirmed.
  • Limit privileged WordPress sessions to trusted browsers and avoid unknown links while assessing exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether image-hover-effects is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record installed plugin versions and flag versions 5.5 or earlier.
  • Review CVE and Patchstack entries for updated fix or mitigation details.
  • Check recent WordPress admin changes for unexpected plugin configuration changes.
  • Verify compensating controls after disabling, removing, or updating the plugin.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-47552 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-47552Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Labib AhmedImage Hover Effects – WordPress Pluginimage-hover-effects, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.