LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-46837: arm32: The cache may not be properly cleaned/invalidated (take two)

Arm provides multiple helpers to clean & invalidate the cache for a given region. This is, for instance, used when allocating guest memory to ensure any writes (such as the ones during scrubbing) have reached memory before handing over the page to a guest. Unfortunately, the arithmetics in the helpers can overflow and would then result to skip the cache cleaning/invalidation. Therefore there is no guarantee when all the writes will reach the memory. This undefined behavior was meant to be addressed by XSA-437, but the approach was not sufficient.

LowCVSS 3.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a low-severity Xen issue on Arm32 where cache maintenance can be skipped after arithmetic overflow. In some guest-memory allocation paths, writes meant to clear or prepare memory may not reliably reach memory before assignment to a guest, creating a limited confidentiality risk.

Executive priority

Treat as scheduled remediation, not an emergency, unless Arm32 Xen hosts run untrusted guests. The business risk is limited data exposure between host memory preparation and guest assignment, with no evidence of active exploitation in the provided sources.

Technical view

Xen Arm32 cache clean/invalidate helpers can overflow while handling a memory region. If that occurs, cache cleaning or invalidation may be skipped. The CVE notes this was intended to be fixed by XSA-437, but that approach was insufficient. CVSS rates it local, low complexity, low-privilege, confidentiality-only impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely limited to Xen deployments using affected Arm32 code paths. The source bundle does not list exact affected versions; teams should consult Xen XSA-447 and distribution advisories for applicability.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. The CVSS vector indicates local access with low privileges is required, with no user interaction and only low confidentiality impact.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is version scope: the bundle points to XSA-447 rather than enumerating affected releases. Focus validation on Arm32 Xen memory allocation and cache-maintenance behavior, but avoid assuming impact on non-Arm32 Xen deployments without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Xen advisory XSA-447 for affected versions and vendor guidance.
  • Apply Xen or distribution updates documented by your platform vendor.
  • Check Fedora advisories if using Fedora Xen packages.
  • Prioritize shared Xen Arm32 hosts running untrusted or tenant-controlled guests.
  • Track XSA-437 follow-up exposure because the earlier fix was insufficient.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Xen hypervisors and identify any Arm32 deployments.
  • Compare installed Xen versions against XSA-447 and distro advisories.
  • Confirm updated Xen packages are installed through normal package records.
  • Document whether untrusted guests share affected hosts.
  • Record compensating controls when vendor fixes are not yet applied.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-46837 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.3CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N1.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.3Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-46837Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
XenXenconsult Xen advisory XSA-447unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.