LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-46191: WordPress Open Graph Metabox Plugin <= 1.4.4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Niels van Renselaar Open Graph Metabox plugin <= 1.4.4 versions.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-46191 is a CSRF flaw in the WordPress Open Graph Metabox plugin through 1.4.4. An attacker would need a logged-in user to interact with attacker-controlled content, potentially causing a limited unauthorized change. The sources rate it medium, not a site takeover.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate hygiene issue. It is lower urgency than unauthenticated remote code execution, but WordPress plugins are common attack surface, and remediation should be scheduled promptly where the plugin is present.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-352 with CVSS 3.1 score 4.3: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N. The impact is integrity-only and low. The source bundle does not describe the vulnerable endpoint, exploit mechanics, or a confirmed fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites that have the Open Graph Metabox plugin installed at version 1.4.4 or earlier. Sites without this plugin are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Successful abuse requires user interaction, most likely involving a logged-in WordPress user. No exploit details are provided in the sources.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The public bundle identifies CSRF, affected plugin, version boundary, CWE, CVSS, and Patchstack reference, but not endpoint details, proof-of-concept status, or a fixed version. Avoid asserting exploitability beyond the CVSS/user-interaction model.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Open Graph Metabox plugin.
  • Check vendor, WordPress, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release.
  • Update if a fixed release is available and tested.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not required.
  • Limit administrative access to trusted users only.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the plugin is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it with 1.4.4.
  • Review vendor or Patchstack advisories for remediation status.
  • Check change logs for CSRF-related fixes before closing remediation.
  • Verify administrative users follow normal phishing-resistant practices.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-46191 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-46191Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Niels van RenselaarOpen Graph Metaboxopen-graph-metabox, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.