LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-45604: WordPress Get Custom Field Values Plugin <= 4.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS)

Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Scott Reilly Get Custom Field Values plugin <= 4.0.1 versions.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-45604 affects the WordPress Get Custom Field Values plugin through version 4.0.1. A highly privileged admin user could store malicious script content that runs when another user views it. The business risk is moderate because exploitation requires admin-level access and user interaction, but successful abuse can affect browser-session data and site trust.

Executive priority

Treat this as a near-term WordPress hygiene item, not an emergency. Prioritize systems with many admins, sensitive sessions, or public-facing business impact, especially if admin accounts may have been compromised.

Technical view

The issue is authenticated stored XSS, classified as CWE-79, in Scott Reilly's Get Custom Field Values WordPress plugin <= 4.0.1. CVSS 3.1 is 5.9 with network access, low complexity, high privileges required, required user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites that have the get-custom-field-values plugin installed at version 4.0.1 or earlier and allow admin-level users to access the vulnerable functionality.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerability requires admin-or-higher privileges and user interaction, reducing broad external exploitability but leaving risk from compromised administrators or hostile insiders.

Researcher notes

Evidence names <= 4.0.1 as affected, but the affected version field in the bundle is incomplete. No patch version or exploit activity is provided. Avoid assuming a fixed release; validate directly against vendor and Patchstack records.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the get-custom-field-values plugin and version.
  • Check Patchstack and vendor guidance for any fixed release or recommended workaround.
  • Restrict admin access to trusted users only.
  • Remove or disable the plugin where it is not business-critical.
  • Review admin accounts for compromise before closing the issue.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether each WordPress site uses the plugin slug get-custom-field-values.
  • Check whether installed versions are 4.0.1 or earlier.
  • Verify admin access is limited and protected with strong authentication.
  • Review recent plugin-related settings or content for suspicious script-like entries.
  • Document remediation status against the vendor or Patchstack advisory.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-45604 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L1.73.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-45604Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Scott ReillyGet Custom Field Valuesget-custom-field-values, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.